看不懂這案例,不是有條法律叫finders, keepers 嗎?
所有跟帖:
•
回複:看不懂這案例,不是有條法律叫finders, keepers 嗎?
-apt-
♂
(973 bytes)
()
07/06/2011 postreply
10:28:51
•
多謝高人指教。錢包的例子大家都知道不可以留下。蘇富比在拍賣前問過BLAKE的後人,也和警察聯係,有沒有遺失
-deerrocks-
♀
(629 bytes)
()
07/06/2011 postreply
11:12:16
•
如果你是V的律師,你會怎麽做?
-deerrocks-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
07/06/2011 postreply
14:31:12
•
回複:如果你是V的律師,你會怎麽做?
-apt-
♂
(271 bytes)
()
07/07/2011 postreply
10:03:39
•
M doesn't have to prove their ownership? they could have
-deerrocks-
♀
(161 bytes)
()
07/07/2011 postreply
13:02:38
•
回複:M doesn't have to prove their ownership? they could have
-apt-
♂
(198 bytes)
()
07/07/2011 postreply
16:16:18
•
the information is on google only because the BBC established th
-deerrocks-
♀
(1170 bytes)
()
07/08/2011 postreply
06:46:18
•
回複:the information is on google only because the BBC established
-apt-
♂
(192 bytes)
()
07/08/2011 postreply
11:14:09
•
Sotheby's didn't exercise the policy when it auctioned off one o
-deerrocks-
♀
(101 bytes)
()
07/08/2011 postreply
11:26:17
•
Vernay的律師應該要求MURRAY拿出相應的遺囑或保險證明
-deerrocks-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
07/08/2011 postreply
07:55:59
•
學習了.
-香香生煎饅頭-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
07/07/2011 postreply
06:00:18