回複:M doesn't have to prove their ownership? they could have

來源: apt 2011-07-07 16:16:18 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (198 bytes)

May be less important since you can even google it and find that it belongs to the family. It is like Iris from Van Gogh. Everybody knows it belongs to Getty museum. There is little to prove.

所有跟帖: 

the information is on google only because the BBC established th -deerrocks- 給 deerrocks 發送悄悄話 deerrocks 的博客首頁 (1170 bytes) () 07/08/2011 postreply 06:46:18

回複:the information is on google only because the BBC established -apt- 給 apt 發送悄悄話 apt 的博客首頁 (192 bytes) () 07/08/2011 postreply 11:14:09

Sotheby's didn't exercise the policy when it auctioned off one o -deerrocks- 給 deerrocks 發送悄悄話 deerrocks 的博客首頁 (101 bytes) () 07/08/2011 postreply 11:26:17

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”