回複：M doesn't have to prove their ownership? they could have

來源: apt 於 2011-07-07 16:16:18 [檔案] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (198 bytes)

回答: M doesn't have to prove their ownership? they could have 由 deerrocks 於 2011-07-07 13:02:38

May be less important since you can even google it and find that it belongs to the family. It is like Iris from Van Gogh. Everybody knows it belongs to Getty museum. There is little to prove.

您的位置：文學城 » 論壇 » 法律谘詢 » 回複：M doesn't have to prove their ownership? they could have

所有跟帖：

• the information is on google only because the BBC established th -deerrocks- ♀ (1170 bytes) () 07/08/2011 postreply 06:46:18

• 回複：the information is on google only because the BBC established -apt- ♂ (192 bytes) () 07/08/2011 postreply 11:14:09

• Sotheby's didn't exercise the policy when it auctioned off one o -deerrocks- ♀ (101 bytes) () 07/08/2011 postreply 11:26:17

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！