M doesn't have to prove their ownership? they could have

來源: deerrocks 於 2011-07-07 13:02:38 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (161 bytes)
回答: 回複：如果你是V的律師，你會怎麽做？ 由 apt 於 2011-07-07 10:03:39

given it as a payment to products/services years ago.  After all there is a gap of 130 years since the painting was known to be with the family.

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：M doesn't have to prove their ownership? they could have -apt- ♂ 給 apt 發送悄悄話 apt 的博客首頁 (198 bytes) () 07/07/2011 postreply 16:16:18

• the information is on google only because the BBC established th -deerrocks- ♀ 給 deerrocks 發送悄悄話 deerrocks 的博客首頁 (1170 bytes) () 07/08/2011 postreply 06:46:18

• 回複：the information is on google only because the BBC established -apt- ♂ 給 apt 發送悄悄話 apt 的博客首頁 (192 bytes) () 07/08/2011 postreply 11:14:09

• Sotheby's didn't exercise the policy when it auctioned off one o -deerrocks- ♀ 給 deerrocks 發送悄悄話 deerrocks 的博客首頁 (101 bytes) () 07/08/2011 postreply 11:26:17

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！