M doesn't have to prove their ownership? they could have

來源: deerrocks 2011-07-07 13:02:38 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (161 bytes)
回答: 回複:如果你是V的律師,你會怎麽做?apt2011-07-07 10:03:39

given it as a payment to products/services years ago.  After all there is a gap of 130 years since the painting was known to be with the family.

所有跟帖: 

回複:M doesn't have to prove their ownership? they could have -apt- 給 apt 發送悄悄話 apt 的博客首頁 (198 bytes) () 07/07/2011 postreply 16:16:18

the information is on google only because the BBC established th -deerrocks- 給 deerrocks 發送悄悄話 deerrocks 的博客首頁 (1170 bytes) () 07/08/2011 postreply 06:46:18

回複:the information is on google only because the BBC established -apt- 給 apt 發送悄悄話 apt 的博客首頁 (192 bytes) () 07/08/2011 postreply 11:14:09

Sotheby's didn't exercise the policy when it auctioned off one o -deerrocks- 給 deerrocks 發送悄悄話 deerrocks 的博客首頁 (101 bytes) () 07/08/2011 postreply 11:26:17

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”