回複:回複:回複:Should I involve to show the proof?

來源: apt 2011-01-19 20:24:07 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1195 bytes)

You are thinking too much. Whether there is a contractual relationship between A and B is a matter totally between them. In your case, A does not have to enter a subcontractor agreement with B or open a bid for your job. Once B agreed to help and A agreed to pay him, there is a contract formed and it does not have to be in writing. They could have done that for other projects which B would have expectation for A to pay him. That is enough. Bottom line is you did not hire B to do your work. You hired A so your contractual relationship is with A and you have no obligation to B.

As I said, if you did not pay A, he could use it as an excuse, in which case B would file a mechanics lien on your property and try to foreclose it if you do not pay. Since you have paid A in full there is nothing you need to worry about.

My guess is that B wants to get the piece of paper in order to show in court that A is lying and he has no excuse but pay B. It could be a cancelled check or a receipt from A. You can mark off your sensitive information and give to B to help him. If you have paid in full, why should you worry about anybody bringing a groundless lawsuit against you?

所有跟帖: 

Apt is right. -糧油- 給 糧油 發送悄悄話 糧油 的博客首頁 (667 bytes) () 01/20/2011 postreply 09:12:29

回複 apt : Thank you again, but the worry is... -94594545- 給 94594545 發送悄悄話 (4296 bytes) () 01/20/2011 postreply 10:45:58

回複:回複 apt : Thank you again, but the worry is... -apt- 給 apt 發送悄悄話 apt 的博客首頁 (513 bytes) () 01/20/2011 postreply 11:03:56

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”