老美阿波羅“登月”照相機，耳聽為虛，眼見為實（圖）

來源: iwbb 於 2011-11-19 13:58:57 [檔案] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀：次 (4591 bytes)

本文內容已被 [ iwbb ] 在 2011-11-20 21:23:00 編輯過。如有問題，請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

老美阿波羅“登月”照相機，耳聽為虛，眼見為實（圖）

可惜啊，老美的阿波羅項目的設計者們在設計阿波羅項目時沒想到月亮上的環境問題，他們以為地球上的高級照相機（Hasselblad 500 EL/70）和柯達膠卷就沒問題了。結果呢，他們用登月的預算拍了一個電視連續劇。

後來，人們問問題了，人們問了月亮上的環境問題，比如說溫度問題（The temperature during the Apollo missions were recorded as being between -180F in the shade to an incredible +200F in full Sunshine.），那啥就說用了各種塗料。

哈哈，耳聽為虛，眼見為實！隻是給相機塗塗料是不夠滴，因為還有鏡頭！

看見鏡頭了嗎？什麽顏色？再看看下麵這個圖

鏡頭是什麽顏色的？

老美阿波羅“登月”在月亮上用的就是這個照相機（圖）

老美阿波羅“登月”項目在月亮上用的就是這個照相機，一模一樣，沒有任何修改，膠卷就是地球上老百姓用的普通柯達膠卷（ektachrome 64 ASA or ISO），本來要裝一個擋板保護普通柯達膠卷防輻射（protective plates were added to the case and film magazine）或鉛包裝（a thick layer of lead around the camera casing），後來沒裝（which according to Hasselblad was not used.）

Cam on the Moon - Hasselblad 500 EL/70

Hasselblad were the manufacturer of the camera that took all of the photos on the Apollo missions. Jan Lundberg was the Manager Of Space Projects at Hasselblad from 1966 to 1975 and responsible for the production and building of the Hasselblad 500 EL/70 cameras that were used on the Apollo Missions. He says 'Originally NASA made all the alterations themselves, then they presented what they had done to us and asked if we could do the same, to which we replied yes we can, and we can do it better. We proceeded to make the alterations that were accepted by NASA.' Protective plates were added to the case and film magazine.

H. J. P. Arnold is an astronomer and keen photographer, an expert on space and astrophotography and was the assistant to the Managing Director at Kodak during the Apollo years. He has authored many space photography books. He comments that the film that was supplied by Kodak for the missions was essentially the same as used here on Earth. it was ektachrome 64 ASA or ISO as it is called today. He has commented that you would expect to see some small dots on the films where a high velocity nuclear particle had hit the film, however no evidence of this whatsoever has come forward. The only thing that would protect the film from this damage would be a thick layer of lead around the camera casing, which according to Hasselblad was not used. Let's also remember that the films were changed whilst outside on the Moon's surface and not in a controlled environment.

An important factor to take into consideration is the great variations in temperature that the film would have had to endure whilst on the lunar surface. The temperature during the Apollo missions were recorded as being between -180F in the shade to an incredible +200F in full Sunshine. How could the film emulsion have withstood such temperature differences? The astronauts can be seen to move between the shadows of the rocks and then into full sunlight in some shots. Surely the film would have perished under such conditions?