In my opinion, Hooft is shit.
Sht Gerard 't Hooft,
If my paper gets published, your all books are trash!!!!
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_sr_sq_top?ie=UTF8&keywords=gerard%20t%20hooft&index=blended&pf_rd_p=486539851&pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe-1&pf_rd_t=201&pf_rd_i=9812793070&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=1X4F7472FAZWEP0DMR3N
Playing With Planets by G. 't Hooft
--- On Wed, 12/15/10, Foundations of Physics <renlethjoyviterbo.pural@springer.com> wrote:
> Dear Dr. He,
>
> We have received your submission FOOP2212 entitled
> "Is an Algebraic Cubic Equation the Primitive Instinct
> beyond Electromagnetic and Nuclear World?"
>
> Before entering a submission to the reviewing process, we
> check whether it obeys criteria such as the following:
>
> - Is the topic of research suitable for this
> journal?
> - Does the paper contain original ideas and
> new
> results?
> - Are the arguments and calculations accurate
> and
> correct?
> - Is the exposition sufficiently well
> organized, and
> worded well?
> - Does the overall quality agree with our
> very tough
> standards?
>
> I regret to inform you that the editors had to conclude
> that this work is not suitable for publication in
> Foundations of Physics.
>
> I would like to thank you very much for forwarding your
> manuscript to us for consideration and wish you every
> success in finding an alternative place of publication.
>
>
> With kind regards,
>
> Gerard 't Hooft
> Chief Editor
>
>
>
> Specific comments from a member of the Editorial Board:
>
> Both the structure and the unduly high degree of
> speculativeness of the arguments presented in this
> manuscript place it outside the scope of Foundations of
> Physics.
>
===================
Dear Dr. He,
We have received your submission FOOP2323 entitled
"A Simple Flat-Universe Model Recovering Mach Principle"
Before entering a submission to the reviewing process, we check whether it obeys criteria such as the following:
- Is the topic of research suitable for this journal?
- Does the paper contain original ideas and new
results?
- Are the arguments and calculations accurate and
correct?
- Is the exposition sufficiently well organized, and
worded well?
- Does the overall quality agree with our very tough
standards?
I regret to inform you that the editors had to conclude that this work is not suitable for publication in Foundations of Physics.
I would like to thank you very much for forwarding your manuscript to us for consideration and wish you every success in finding an alternative place of publication.
With kind regards,
Gerard 't Hooft
Chief Editor
Specific comments from a member of the Editorial Board:
Regrettably, both the structure and the overall quality of the manuscript make it unfit for publication in Foundations of Physics. This manifests itself in, among other deficits, a lack of references to recent literature.
====================
We have received your submission FOOP2322 entitled
"Quantum Gravity Based on Mach Principle and its Solar Application"
Before entering a submission to the reviewing process, we check whether it obeys criteria such as the following:
- Is the topic of research suitable for this journal?
- Does the paper contain original ideas and new
results?
- Are the arguments and calculations accurate and
correct?
- Is the exposition sufficiently well organized, and
worded well?
- Does the overall quality agree with our very tough
standards?
I regret to inform you that the editors had to conclude that this work is not suitable for publication in Foundations of Physics.
I would like to thank you very much for forwarding your manuscript to us for consideration and wish you every success in finding an alternative place of publication.
With kind regards,
Gerard 't Hooft
Chief Editor
Specific comments from a member of the Editorial Board:
Regrettably, both the structure and the overall quality of the manuscript make it unfit for publication in Foundations of Physics. This manifests itself in, among other deficits, a lack of references to recent literature.
