NIW@VSCworst


It seems that NIW at Vermont are getting worse and worse.
In order to reduce backlog, Vermont don't give RFE anymore
and many qualified person are denied immediately.

At immigration.com, a person got 4 papers and 2 NASA
references get rejected without RFE only because she
dose not have too many citations. And more importantly,
the rejection letter says 'A project that has national
interest does not necessarily ensure that the person
in the position eligible for NIW......'????

My lawyer tells me that for the whole year of 2004,
he only got one NIW case denied, but for the Jan.
and Feb. of 2005, he already got 4 cases denied. The
reasons are almost the same, (1) not too many citations,
(2) references by the people who knows the applicant
(3) not many publications so the work does not have
influence on the field.

I know a lot NIW applicants only have about 2-3
papers and do have too many citations (I am one of them).
Now it seems they all likely will get rejected
directly without RFE. This is terrible.

Before, Vermont is quite nice to NIW applicants,
but now, it is becoming the worst.


所有跟帖: 

回複:NIW@VSCworst -toosad...- 給 toosad... 發送悄悄話 (32 bytes) () 02/24/2005 postreply 08:05:47

回复:NIW@VSCworst -tootoobad- 給 tootoobad 發送悄悄話 (402 bytes) () 02/24/2005 postreply 08:29:59

苦命的CIS,慢了快了都會被罵 -NIW_2004- 給 NIW_2004 發送悄悄話 (815 bytes) () 02/24/2005 postreply 09:10:04

簡單,都批了就不會再被罵. -Itistrue- 給 Itistrue 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 02/24/2005 postreply 11:09:02

can you tell me the AAO websit -appeal- 給 appeal 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 02/24/2005 postreply 13:52:02

回複:苦命的CIS,慢了快了都會被罵 -NIWRN- 給 NIWRN 發送悄悄話 (205 bytes) () 02/25/2005 postreply 04:41:10

My LG's NIW was rejected in -inJan- 給 inJan 發送悄悄話 (234 bytes) () 02/24/2005 postreply 11:27:27

回复:NIW@VSCworst -waitpray- 給 waitpray 發送悄悄話 (315 bytes) () 02/24/2005 postreply 13:01:17

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!