As you said above: "The unexpired I-94 may protect him from accruing days towards 3/10 year bar though", that is because the person is lawfully present (or say "authorized presence") during the I-94 duration (unexpired) and thus, he is not subjected to 3-year or 10-year bar. - It would not appropriate to interpret "do not accrue unlawful presence" to "lawfully present"
回複:回複:Sorry but it would be difficult - 回複:急求教皮匠和8老師
所有跟帖:
• 回複:回複:回複:Sorry but it would be difficult - 回複:急求教皮匠和8老師 -863211- ♂ (1291 bytes) () 01/26/2012 postreply 14:31:20
• 回複:回複:回複:回複:Sorry but it would be difficult - 回複:急求教皮匠和8老師 -xiaolingzhang93- ♀ (3771 bytes) () 01/26/2012 postreply 14:33:34
• 回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:Sorry but it would be difficult - 回複:急求教皮匠和8老師 -863211- ♂ (758 bytes) () 01/26/2012 postreply 15:47:36
• 回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:Sorry but it would be difficult - 回複:急求教皮匠和8老 -xiaolingzhang93- ♀ (13 bytes) () 01/26/2012 postreply 19:47:26