回複:回複:回複:回複:Sorry but it would be difficult - 回複:急求教皮匠和8老師

來源: xiaolingzhang93 2012-01-26 14:33:34 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (3771 bytes)

-I think if a person presence is not counted as unlawful presence, it is reasonable to say this person's presence is lawful or say "authorized stay", and don't think there is a status between lawful/authorized presence and unlawful presence. Even if a person violate the condition and term of status during I-94 vadility, he is authorized to stay until USCIS/DHS or immigration judge make a decsion that he is not authorized to stay.

 

 

http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Laws/Memoranda/Static_Files_Memoranda/2009/revision_redesign_AFM.PDF

The following statement is from above link.

(a)(2)

………..

However, the fact that the alien does not accrue unlawful presence does not mean that the alien’s presence in the United States is actually lawful.

所有跟帖: 

回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:Sorry but it would be difficult - 回複:急求教皮匠和8老師 -863211- 給 863211 發送悄悄話 863211 的博客首頁 (758 bytes) () 01/26/2012 postreply 15:47:36

回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:Sorry but it would be difficult - 回複:急求教皮匠和8老 -xiaolingzhang93- 給 xiaolingzhang93 發送悄悄話 (13 bytes) () 01/26/2012 postreply 19:47:26

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”