回複：Sorry but it would be difficult - 回複：急求教皮匠和8老師

As you said above: "The unexpired I-94 may protect him from accruing days towards 3/10 year bar though", that is because the person is lawfully present (or say "authorized presence") during the I-94 duration (unexpired) and thus, he is not subjected to 3-year or 10-year bar.

Lawful presence or unlawful presence is different from In-status or out of status. They are different concept though they are related, but not the same. When a perosn I-94 expires, his unlawyful presence begin to be counted until he leaves US or file I-485.

See this USCIS link:

http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Laws/Memoranda/Static_Files_Memoranda/2009/revision_redesign_AFM.PDF

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：回複：Sorry but it would be difficult - 回複：急求教皮匠和8老師 -pjiang- ♀ (631 bytes) () 01/26/2012 postreply 10:49:41

• 回複：回複：回複：Sorry but it would be difficult - 回複：急求教皮匠和8老師 -863211- ♂ (1291 bytes) () 01/26/2012 postreply 14:31:20

• 回複：回複：回複：回複：Sorry but it would be difficult - 回複：急求教皮匠和8老師 -xiaolingzhang93- ♀ (3771 bytes) () 01/26/2012 postreply 14:33:34

• 回複：回複：回複：回複：回複：Sorry but it would be difficult - 回複：急求教皮匠和8老師 -863211- ♂ (758 bytes) () 01/26/2012 postreply 15:47:36

• 回複：回複：回複：回複：回複：回複：Sorry but it would be difficult - 回複：急求教皮匠和8老 -xiaolingzhang93- ♀ (13 bytes) () 01/26/2012 postreply 19:47:26