請教863211，皮匠和小白兔老師：中的一句話

4. If an H-1 or L-1 nonimmigrant has traveled abroad and reentered the United States via advance parole, the alien is accordingly in parole status. How does the interim rule affect that alien's employment authorization?

請問問題4中的下麵的這句話如何理解：“had the alien not left and returned under advance parole”。 曾經在一個老印的壇子中讀到意思是第二次用AP入境後必須用EAD工作。當時覺得很無稽，但現在閱讀這句話就覺得確實是這個意思。因為從第一次使用AP後每次出境和入境時都將處於同樣的AP身份了。

請確認這種理解是否正確。如果錯誤的話，到底應該怎末理解? Thanks.


A Service memorandum dated August 5, 1997, stated that an "adjustment applicant's otherwise valid and unexpired nonimmigrant employment authorization ...is not terminated by his or her temporary departure from the United States, if prior to such departure the applicant obtained advance parole in accordance with 8 CFR 245.2(a)(4)(ii)." The Service intends to clarify this issue in the final rule. Until then, if the alien's H-1 or L-1 employment authorization would not have expired, had the alien not left and returned under advance parole, the Service will not consider a paroled adjustment applicant's failure to obtain a separate employment authorization document to mean that the paroled adjustment applicant engaged in unauthorized employment by working for the H-1 or L-1 employer between the date of his or her parole and the date to be specified in the final rule.

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：請教863211，皮匠和小白兔老師：CRONIN MEMO中的一句話 -ladodger- ♂ (8 bytes) () 11/03/2009 postreply 10:40:09

• 回複：請教863211，皮匠和小白兔老師：中的一句話 -pjiang- ♀ (620 bytes) () 11/03/2009 postreply 10:46:13

• 回複：回複：請教863211，皮匠和小白兔老師：中的一句話 -ladodger- ♂ (646 bytes) () 11/03/2009 postreply 11:20:12