回複:I think USCIS made a mistake on your wife's case

來源: gcemerg 2008-02-27 10:54:45 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (489 bytes)
win963852741,

No matter it's for primary applicant or for dependant, I believe 180-day ruly applies. So I don't think the following statement is true.

"if the principal is eligible for adjustment of status under section 245(k), the spouse and minor, unmarried children may adjust status under section 245(k) even if they have been out-of- status for over 180 days.
"
If you're sure about this statement, can you share from where you got this info?



所有跟帖: 

read it again, it says what u suggested -win963852741- 給 win963852741 發送悄悄話 (169 bytes) () 02/27/2008 postreply 10:59:03

回複:read it again, it says what u suggested -gcemerg- 給 gcemerg 發送悄悄話 (402 bytes) () 02/27/2008 postreply 11:07:08

agree -win963852741- 給 win963852741 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 02/27/2008 postreply 11:12:33

回複:回複:read it again, it says what u suggested -isman- 給 isman 發送悄悄話 (103 bytes) () 02/27/2008 postreply 11:31:50

have u talk to a lawyer yet? -win963852741- 給 win963852741 發送悄悄話 (54 bytes) () 02/27/2008 postreply 11:46:44

我的律師說245(k)不適用於我太太這種情況, 因為她曾是F-1 status -isman- 給 isman 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 02/27/2008 postreply 12:16:59

回複:我的律師說245(k)不適用於我太太這種情況, 因為她曾是F-1 status -gcemerg- 給 gcemerg 發送悄悄話 (861 bytes) () 02/27/2008 postreply 12:47:51

回複:我覺得有點危險。 -紅葉- 給 紅葉 發送悄悄話 (545 bytes) () 02/27/2008 postreply 14:26:58

here is the link for 245k -win963852741- 給 win963852741 發送悄悄話 (87 bytes) () 02/27/2008 postreply 11:03:26

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”