今天收到法庭Order要求原告和被告先協商一個解決方案,法庭然後再當庭聽證雙方辯論,最後做出本案的終裁。如果雙方有一致的解決意見,法庭也可以直接按照原告和被告雙方的意見下Order,這樣也就免去上庭聽證了。有沒有可能和政府律師麵談“私了”?本人在此懇請高人指點下一步的行動!多謝!!!
WOM案子出現轉機,懇請高人指點下一步!!!
所有跟帖:
•
回複:WOM案子出現轉機,懇請高人指點下一步!!!
-bioinfo-
♂
(234 bytes)
()
10/17/2007 postreply
19:23:25
•
回複:上庭私了,原告的目的是要加快NC速度,隻要能達成
-radiology-
♂
(12 bytes)
()
10/17/2007 postreply
19:26:51
•
多謝鼓勵!!!
-haole999-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
10/17/2007 postreply
19:53:55
•
回複:回複:WOM案子出現轉機,懇請高人指點下一步!!!
-haole999-
♀
(269 bytes)
()
10/17/2007 postreply
19:34:38
•
回複:回複:回複:WOM案子出現轉機,懇請高人指點下一步!!!
-bioinfo-
♂
(172 bytes)
()
10/17/2007 postreply
20:23:17
•
Bioinfo: 本案的特點就在於(見內)...
-haole999-
♀
(218 bytes)
()
10/17/2007 postreply
20:53:37
•
then you won, expect to get GC soon, good job
-bioinfo-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
10/18/2007 postreply
08:46:50
•
Bioinfo: 你是說AUSA政府律師可以重新再次遞交MTD嗎?
-haole999-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
10/17/2007 postreply
19:58:07
•
yes, if they didn't agree with your response to MTD
-bioinfo-
♂
(141 bytes)
()
10/17/2007 postreply
20:16:55
•
這次法庭的order已經明確寫明了AUSA的MTD被DENIED, AUSA還可以在交新的MTD嗎?
-haole999-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
10/17/2007 postreply
20:24:48
•
回複:好象法官想幫你並給AUSA一個台階下,也不想搞個
-six110-
♂
(76 bytes)
()
10/17/2007 postreply
23:41:21
•
回複:這次法庭的order已經明確寫明了AUSA的MTD被DENIED, AUSA還可以在交新的MTD嗎?
-bioinfo-
♂
(192 bytes)
()
10/18/2007 postreply
08:50:06
•
Here is a recent won case for your good reference. - 回複:WOM案子出現轉
-pjiang-
♀
(120 bytes)
()
10/17/2007 postreply
19:38:07
•
多謝了!!!
-haole999-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
10/17/2007 postreply
19:52:49
•
me too
-bitterness-
♀
(107 bytes)
()
10/17/2007 postreply
21:36:44
•
Please share your WOM info - Which court you are in?
-NCENDLESSWAITING-
♂
(44 bytes)
()
10/18/2007 postreply
09:15:44
•
in the Missouri Eastern District (MOED)
-haole999-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
10/18/2007 postreply
11:02:35
•
回複:me too
-bioinfo-
♂
(248 bytes)
()
10/18/2007 postreply
10:30:49