How I read 好文重發-我為什麽要遊行, and why can't support

Just read 好文重發-我為什麽要遊行.

In this article, the author states主要原因: 反對DoS和USCIS的粗暴做法,別忘了他們作為政府是為我們納稅人服務的.(最後那個S:service - 我們的小費給的可是>30%.)

I don’t see the announcement made by DOS and USCIS was粗暴做法. The reality is there is no valid visa number. By law USCIS can accept I-485 only when there are visa numbers available. If the stop of accepting application because of visa number is a 粗暴做法, this 粗暴做法 happened several times before.

“別忘了他們作為政府是為我們納稅人服務的.” It is even ridiculous. Remember, it is US government, not your government. 政府是為我們納稅人服務的? So the Iraq war has to stop to serve you? 納稅人? What does this to do with GC application? You earn money, you pay tax. It is law. That’s simple. Law does not say “The foreign tax payers have to get US citizenship immediately”. Tax is nothing to do with what you are protesting.

(最後那個S:service - 我們的小費給的可是>30%.): Funny. Where did you file your tax? USCIS or IRS? You don’t know the function of different government agencies. If this is your reason to protest, you should protest IRS, not USCIS. The USCIS does not just serve foreigners like you and me, but also US citizens. In you eye, USCI Service is like a restaurant, where it serves you and you pay tips. How funny it is.


要求道歉,我是小農,要求賠款. I admire you to say that, because this is what you really want to achieve. But that's also why I said your protest will change nothing, and will not get support. This protest is very personal. If you could get 賠款, you would not protest. How could this protest be justified?

“即使沒40萬,10萬也總有的.”. My friends, it is not about the people number; it is about visa number. I wish USCIS still had 40萬 visa number, but the reality is none exits.

同理,我也不認為Lawsuit能改變這一點.不過我會參加lawsuit,不隻是壯聲勢,說不定可以賠錢哪! It further proves the real motive of this protest which will not support by majority people. Since you are so personal, how could you expect others to help you? The simple question is why we need to buy your ticket?

主題我覺得選得很好,就是抗議美國大人濫用職權,損害了我們合法移民和納稅人的權利. What is your theme? The theme should be changed to “I WANT MY MONEY BACK”. USCIS does not take any of your money. It is your attorney and post office took your money. USCIS never says you need to hire an attorney. It was your decision to have your attorney. So why protest USCIS to get your money back? On the other hand, when you made a bad investment, such as stock or buying house, do you protest to get money back? It does not make sense. If you did everything yourself, which you should, you wouldn’t have too much financial loss.

希望有更多的人能夠站出來,發出我們中國人的聲音. I wish you all the best in your protest, I'm really sympathy about your loss, but don’t use Chinese name as a whole.

Take care yourself in new protesting this weekend.

You may not agree with what I said. Civil response will be appreciated. No response will be given if anyone wants to evoke the fighting.

所有跟帖： 

• 屁話連篇！ -昔日- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/10/2007 postreply 19:01:43

• good one! Ding! -gurululu- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/10/2007 postreply 19:45:27

• 自己當狗就罷了，為什麽瘋咬其他要當人的？狗性奴性太強了吧？ -宏揚正氣- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/10/2007 postreply 19:56:40

• 有理走遍天下，不管中國美國；無理寸步難行，無論是你是我。 -山中小路- ♂ (20 bytes) () 07/10/2007 postreply 22:01:24

• 有理走遍天下，不管中國美國；無理寸步難行，說這話簡直幼稚得不行. -mugen- ♂ (38 bytes) () 07/10/2007 postreply 23:13:34

• 強勢美國政府總是有理，弱勢中國新移民總是無理，你還 -虛心請教大家啦- ♂ (385 bytes) () 07/11/2007 postreply 04:42:54

• 對比老墨非法移民.我隻能更尊重他們. -mugen- ♂ (36 bytes) () 07/10/2007 postreply 21:22:43

• 大致正確。 -山中小路- ♂ (524 bytes) () 07/10/2007 postreply 21:58:24

• 你大概是拿了卡已經擠上車的那一群 -虛心請教大家啦- ♂ (1180 bytes) () 07/11/2007 postreply 05:01:08

• 正因為以前出現了失誤，才發7月2日公告以做修正。看來， -山中小路- ♂ (319 bytes) () 07/11/2007 postreply 10:51:26

• who's responsible for 失誤? if 失誤 explains everything -虛心請教大家啦- ♂ (208 bytes) () 07/11/2007 postreply 12:23:48