參院 Bill 關於Employment Base 的澄清

我在http://www.senate.org上所能找到的Bill, amendment 似乎都隻是Family Based filed after May 1, 2005需要從新file. Employment pending/approved immigration petition could serve as the base for adjustment of status.

這似乎與USA TODAY矛盾, 有人能發現USA TODAY 所依據的Bill原文嗎?

Amendment introduced by Sanders 也並未要求Employment Based 從新file.

Any comments?

所有跟帖： 

• sorry, should be senate.gov -chinatea- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/28/2007 postreply 22:57:01

• 我也找了半天,沒找到這個法案 -灌水專用名- ♂ (275 bytes) () 05/28/2007 postreply 23:06:34

• 《世界日報》5月10日的報導： -紅葉- ♀ (1250 bytes) () 05/28/2007 postreply 23:36:13

• if happend in Canada before. -DO-PERM- ♂ (158 bytes) () 05/28/2007 postreply 23:40:12

• 到時候這些人來個CLASS ACTION,就夠他們受的了 -灌水專用名- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/29/2007 postreply 00:00:51

• 請看小白兔的回答，05／01／05 cut-off包括EB 申請 -nonpro- ♂ (315 bytes) () 05/29/2007 postreply 06:02:47

• 回複：請看小白兔的回答，05／01／05 cut-off包括EB 申請 -請幫忙出主意- ♀ (57 bytes) () 05/29/2007 postreply 06:46:49

• 回複：請看小白兔的回答，05／01／05 cut-off包括EB 申請 -phate2006- ♂ (171 bytes) () 05/29/2007 postreply 07:51:22

• xiaobaitu, where did you find your source? -chinatea- ♂ (7 bytes) () 05/29/2007 postreply 07:14:46