美國公證員無法證明這一事實的真實性,最多隻能 證明翻譯者的簽字屬實,顯然僅僅翻譯者簽字屬實不能證明結婚文件的真實性
必須要中國政府公證處出具的翻譯公證才有法律效力
這樣的公證對辦理移民無效,因為結婚這一事實發生在中國
所有跟帖:
•
謝謝各位,祝大家晚安
-卿-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
05/25/2007 postreply
23:02:10
•
不同意您的看法 -- Notary Public 蓋章條件是你本人簽名
-mission08-
♂
(125 bytes)
()
05/25/2007 postreply
23:10:22
•
請看清楚樓上的問題,人家問結婚證怎麽辦公證,不是EB1/NIW
-xiaobaitu-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
05/25/2007 postreply
23:13:25
•
有區別嗎?
-mission08-
♂
(172 bytes)
()
05/25/2007 postreply
23:18:52
•
I-864並非任何情況下都不需要公證,在廣州領館辦理移民就
-xiaobaitu-
♀
(150 bytes)
()
05/25/2007 postreply
23:25:48
•
AS said, notary public only notarized the translation and leaves
-mission08-
♂
(84 bytes)
()
05/25/2007 postreply
23:31:48
•
Many I-485 cases are approved without interview at all.
-mission08-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
05/25/2007 postreply
23:32:39
•
I-864 only are required by the I-485 base on marriage
-xiaobaitu-
♀
(61 bytes)
()
05/25/2007 postreply
23:41:17
•
wrong -- it is required for all FB based I-485
-mission08-
♂
(72 bytes)
()
05/25/2007 postreply
23:47:51
•
so funny,人家問結婚,你扯父母
-xiaobaitu-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
05/25/2007 postreply
23:50:07
•
i thought she asked for marriage certificate, not
-mission08-
♂
(37 bytes)
()
05/25/2007 postreply
23:51:34
•
I mean, marriage cert is also required when USC sponsors DAD.
-mission08-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
05/26/2007 postreply
00:13:11
•
隻有中國政府的公證處或是中國駐美使領館才有資格證明
-xiaobaitu-
♀
(27 bytes)
()
05/25/2007 postreply
23:27:40
•
The marriage certificate itself proves the legal fact so all
-mission08-
♂
(212 bytes)
()
05/25/2007 postreply
23:30:38