美國公證員無法證明這一事實的真實性,最多隻能 證明翻譯者的簽字屬實,顯然僅僅翻譯者簽字屬實不能證明結婚文件的真實性
必須要中國政府公證處出具的翻譯公證才有法律效力
這樣的公證對辦理移民無效,因為結婚這一事實發生在中國
所有跟帖:
• 謝謝各位,祝大家晚安 -卿- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:02:10
• 不同意您的看法 -- Notary Public 蓋章條件是你本人簽名 -mission08- ♂ (125 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:10:22
• 請看清楚樓上的問題,人家問結婚證怎麽辦公證,不是EB1/NIW -xiaobaitu- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:13:25
• 有區別嗎? -mission08- ♂ (172 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:18:52
• I-864並非任何情況下都不需要公證,在廣州領館辦理移民就 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (150 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:25:48
• AS said, notary public only notarized the translation and leaves -mission08- ♂ (84 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:31:48
• Many I-485 cases are approved without interview at all. -mission08- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:32:39
• I-864 only are required by the I-485 base on marriage -xiaobaitu- ♀ (61 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:41:17
• wrong -- it is required for all FB based I-485 -mission08- ♂ (72 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:47:51
• so funny,人家問結婚,你扯父母 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:50:07
• i thought she asked for marriage certificate, not -mission08- ♂ (37 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:51:34
• I mean, marriage cert is also required when USC sponsors DAD. -mission08- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/26/2007 postreply 00:13:11
• 隻有中國政府的公證處或是中國駐美使領館才有資格證明 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (27 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:27:40
• The marriage certificate itself proves the legal fact so all -mission08- ♂ (212 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:30:38