有區別嗎？

I-864以前需要公證才有效，現在隻需本人簽名，但加入了Under the penalty of perjury 條款。在美國，這大概比國內公證處的印章更有效吧？

現在覺著'我為魚肉'說得有些道理了。

所有跟帖： 

• I-864並非任何情況下都不需要公證，在廣州領館辦理移民就 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (150 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:25:48

• AS said, notary public only notarized the translation and leaves -mission08- ♂ (84 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:31:48

• Many I-485 cases are approved without interview at all. -mission08- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:32:39

• I-864 only are required by the I-485 base on marriage -xiaobaitu- ♀ (61 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:41:17

• wrong -- it is required for all FB based I-485 -mission08- ♂ (72 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:47:51

• so funny，人家問結婚，你扯父母 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:50:07

• i thought she asked for marriage certificate, not -mission08- ♂ (37 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:51:34

• I mean, marriage cert is also required when USC sponsors DAD. -mission08- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/26/2007 postreply 00:13:11

• 隻有中國政府的公證處或是中國駐美使領館才有資格證明 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (27 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:27:40

• The marriage certificate itself proves the legal fact so all -mission08- ♂ (212 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:30:38