要求補充下麵幾條：
The evidence, as initially ted, is insufficient to warrant approval.
Evidence of the following types might be particularly helpful:
1) Evidence which indicate that the award for Progress in Science and technology granted by the Chinese Academy of Sciences constittutes a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award;
這一條我在網上下載了獎勵條例的中文文件，翻譯了其中一部分，另外在請國內原單位出具一封信，解釋一下這個獎的評選標準及過程 （這封信最初遞交了，有必要再更新一下嗎？）。由於這一條十分重要，還能提供其它什麽證據嗎？
2) Evidence that the beneficiary's work has attracted significant interest from academic institutions, from government, or from industry in the form of major research grants or funding awards;
有一個美國小的Grant的和出國前幾個中國的Grants，準備了。其他的幾個都是參加課題研究，讓PI寫了證明信不知道有沒有用？
3) Articles or exvcerpts from trade publications, journals, or magzines in which the beneficiary's achivements are commented on by his peers; or copies or trans of major media items (newspaper articles, radio or TV spots, etc.) in which the beneficiary is mentioned by name.
這一條沒有直接的證據，但有媒體采訪總課題首席科學家的報道，我是其中一個子課題主持人，報道中根本沒有替我的名字。這個報道有用嗎？
另外我滿足了其他幾條：比如是多個雜誌的審稿人，研究成果的原創性（原來提交了多封來自政府部門和其他獨立推薦人的推薦信）。在這次RFE中是否要重新提供一遍這些證據？需要更多推薦信嗎？
詢問律師RFE的工作方案，律師隻是說有什麽就提供什麽，跟什麽都沒有說一樣。
請位前輩幫忙，多謝了。
The evidence, as initially ted, is insufficient to warrant approval.
Evidence of the following types might be particularly helpful:
1) Evidence which indicate that the award for Progress in Science and technology granted by the Chinese Academy of Sciences constittutes a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award;
這一條我在網上下載了獎勵條例的中文文件，翻譯了其中一部分，另外在請國內原單位出具一封信，解釋一下這個獎的評選標準及過程 （這封信最初遞交了，有必要再更新一下嗎？）。由於這一條十分重要，還能提供其它什麽證據嗎？
2) Evidence that the beneficiary's work has attracted significant interest from academic institutions, from government, or from industry in the form of major research grants or funding awards;
有一個美國小的Grant的和出國前幾個中國的Grants，準備了。其他的幾個都是參加課題研究，讓PI寫了證明信不知道有沒有用？
3) Articles or exvcerpts from trade publications, journals, or magzines in which the beneficiary's achivements are commented on by his peers; or copies or trans of major media items (newspaper articles, radio or TV spots, etc.) in which the beneficiary is mentioned by name.
這一條沒有直接的證據，但有媒體采訪總課題首席科學家的報道，我是其中一個子課題主持人，報道中根本沒有替我的名字。這個報道有用嗎？
另外我滿足了其他幾條：比如是多個雜誌的審稿人，研究成果的原創性（原來提交了多封來自政府部門和其他獨立推薦人的推薦信）。在這次RFE中是否要重新提供一遍這些證據？需要更多推薦信嗎？
詢問律師RFE的工作方案，律師隻是說有什麽就提供什麽，跟什麽都沒有說一樣。
請位前輩幫忙，多謝了。
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”
