Evidence of the following types might be particularly helpful:
1) Evidence which indicate that the award for Progress in Science and technology granted by the Chinese Academy of Sciences constittutes a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award;
這一條我在網上下載了獎勵條例的中文文件，翻譯了其中一部分，另外在請國內原單位出具一封信，解釋一下這個獎的評選標準及過程 （這封信最初遞交了，有必要再更新一下嗎？）。由於這一條十分重要，還能提供其它什麽證據嗎？
***************************************************
*******: If I were you, I would handle the award in the follwoing way: make a color copy of the award, an English translation, translation certificate signed by one of your Ph.D friends (but not by you, you can translate chinese paper abstracts but not these kinds of evidence). The letter from your prior empolyer must show that evalution criteria are high and most important thing needed to mention is among how many candiadates you were selected as the award recipient, that is, the awarding process is highly selective.
2) Evidence that the beneficiary's work has attracted significant interest from academic institutions, from government, or from industry in the form of major research grants or funding awards;
有一個美國小的Grant的和出國前幾個中國的Grants，準備了。其他的幾個都是參加課題研究，讓PI寫了證明信不知道有沒有用？
***********************************************
Here you need to find relevant evidence to demonstrate you are an expert recognized nationally or internationally in your field. For example, Has anybody in your fild from other institutions ever requested any help from you in the field of your effort, via email, regular mail, post card or even telephone etc..................and so on.. Have you ever got any grants from industry because of your experitse in that area? In one word, you need to demonstrate the influence of your work.
3) Articles or exvcerpts from trade publications, journals, or magzines in which the beneficiary's achivements are commented on by his peers; or copies or trans of major media items (newspaper articles, radio or TV spots, etc.) in which the beneficiary is mentioned by name.
這一條沒有直接的證據，但有媒體采訪總課題首席科學家的報道，我是其中一個子課題主持人，報道中根本沒有替我的名字。這個報道有用嗎？
*************************************************** ask 總課題首席科學家 to write a letter for you to attest your contribution in that project, attach it to the 媒體采訪報道. Anyway, it is better than nothing.
另外我滿足了其他幾條：比如是多個雜誌的審稿人，研究成果的原創性（原來提交了多封來自政府部門和其他獨立推薦人的推薦信）。在這次RFE中是否要重新提供一遍？需要更多推薦信嗎？
*************you do not need to those already ted evidence, but you need to present those pieces of evidnce again in your RFE response letter.
You need 3-4 recomm letters (better from those citing your work), compose a new RFE response letter with all evidence you have (including new and old).
詢問律師RFE的工作方案，律師隻是說有什麽就提供什麽，跟什麽都沒有說一樣。
******** Generally yes, it will be ideal to provide what they requested, but the problem is that the officers usually do not give the specific request in such type of RFE, so you need to figure out what evidence can meet the requirements.
Just for your reference. Good luck.
yjy_wang@yahoo.com
1) Evidence which indicate that the award for Progress in Science and technology granted by the Chinese Academy of Sciences constittutes a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award;
這一條我在網上下載了獎勵條例的中文文件，翻譯了其中一部分，另外在請國內原單位出具一封信，解釋一下這個獎的評選標準及過程 （這封信最初遞交了，有必要再更新一下嗎？）。由於這一條十分重要，還能提供其它什麽證據嗎？
***************************************************
*******: If I were you, I would handle the award in the follwoing way: make a color copy of the award, an English translation, translation certificate signed by one of your Ph.D friends (but not by you, you can translate chinese paper abstracts but not these kinds of evidence). The letter from your prior empolyer must show that evalution criteria are high and most important thing needed to mention is among how many candiadates you were selected as the award recipient, that is, the awarding process is highly selective.
2) Evidence that the beneficiary's work has attracted significant interest from academic institutions, from government, or from industry in the form of major research grants or funding awards;
有一個美國小的Grant的和出國前幾個中國的Grants，準備了。其他的幾個都是參加課題研究，讓PI寫了證明信不知道有沒有用？
***********************************************
Here you need to find relevant evidence to demonstrate you are an expert recognized nationally or internationally in your field. For example, Has anybody in your fild from other institutions ever requested any help from you in the field of your effort, via email, regular mail, post card or even telephone etc..................and so on.. Have you ever got any grants from industry because of your experitse in that area? In one word, you need to demonstrate the influence of your work.
3) Articles or exvcerpts from trade publications, journals, or magzines in which the beneficiary's achivements are commented on by his peers; or copies or trans of major media items (newspaper articles, radio or TV spots, etc.) in which the beneficiary is mentioned by name.
這一條沒有直接的證據，但有媒體采訪總課題首席科學家的報道，我是其中一個子課題主持人，報道中根本沒有替我的名字。這個報道有用嗎？
*************************************************** ask 總課題首席科學家 to write a letter for you to attest your contribution in that project, attach it to the 媒體采訪報道. Anyway, it is better than nothing.
另外我滿足了其他幾條：比如是多個雜誌的審稿人，研究成果的原創性（原來提交了多封來自政府部門和其他獨立推薦人的推薦信）。在這次RFE中是否要重新提供一遍？需要更多推薦信嗎？
*************you do not need to those already ted evidence, but you need to present those pieces of evidnce again in your RFE response letter.
You need 3-4 recomm letters (better from those citing your work), compose a new RFE response letter with all evidence you have (including new and old).
詢問律師RFE的工作方案，律師隻是說有什麽就提供什麽，跟什麽都沒有說一樣。
******** Generally yes, it will be ideal to provide what they requested, but the problem is that the officers usually do not give the specific request in such type of RFE, so you need to figure out what evidence can meet the requirements.
Just for your reference. Good luck.
yjy_wang@yahoo.com
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”
