要求補充下麵幾條：
1) Evidence which indicate that the award for Progress in Science and technology granted by the Chinese Academy of Sciences constittutes a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award;
這一條我在網上下載了獎勵條例的中文文件，翻譯了其中一部分，另外在請國內原單位出具一封信，解釋一下這個獎的評選標準及過程 （這封信最初遞交了，有必要再更新一下嗎？）。由於這一條十分重要，還能提供其它什麽證據嗎？
Got to prepare this one very well. Update the information. In the letter from China, you should indicate that the award is at the national level, reserved for top scientists in the field and the competition is open to all scientists in the field in China (not limited to a small group of scientist).
2) Evidence that the beneficiary's work has attracted significant interest from academic institutions, from government, or from industry in the form of major research grants or funding awards;
有一個美國小的Grant的和出國前幾個中國的Grants，準備了。其他的幾個都是參加課題研究，讓PI寫了證明信不知道有沒有用？
All these should be helpful. You may need to emphysize that the grants were awarded due to your significant contributions.
(This is not one of the ten requirements. Why need grants?)
3) Articles or exvcerpts from trade publications, journals, or magzines in which the beneficiary's achivements are commented on by his peers; or copies or trans of major media items (newspaper articles, radio or TV spots, etc.) in which the beneficiary is mentioned by name.
這一條沒有直接的證據，但有媒體采訪總課題首席科學家的報道，我是其中一個子課題主持人，報道中根本沒有替我的名字。這個報道有用嗎？
You may say directly that you are not claim this one, but since the importance of your work you participated, the PI was reported. and your work has been cited by scientists around the world.
另外我滿足了其他幾條：比如是多個雜誌的審稿人，研究成果的原創性（原來提交了多封來自政府部門和其他獨立推薦人的推薦信）。在這次RFE中是否要重新提供一遍這些證據？需要更多推薦信嗎？
Provide a few letters would help too. Highlight these items you claim to be satisfied.
1) Evidence which indicate that the award for Progress in Science and technology granted by the Chinese Academy of Sciences constittutes a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award;
這一條我在網上下載了獎勵條例的中文文件，翻譯了其中一部分，另外在請國內原單位出具一封信，解釋一下這個獎的評選標準及過程 （這封信最初遞交了，有必要再更新一下嗎？）。由於這一條十分重要，還能提供其它什麽證據嗎？
Got to prepare this one very well. Update the information. In the letter from China, you should indicate that the award is at the national level, reserved for top scientists in the field and the competition is open to all scientists in the field in China (not limited to a small group of scientist).
2) Evidence that the beneficiary's work has attracted significant interest from academic institutions, from government, or from industry in the form of major research grants or funding awards;
有一個美國小的Grant的和出國前幾個中國的Grants，準備了。其他的幾個都是參加課題研究，讓PI寫了證明信不知道有沒有用？
All these should be helpful. You may need to emphysize that the grants were awarded due to your significant contributions.
(This is not one of the ten requirements. Why need grants?)
3) Articles or exvcerpts from trade publications, journals, or magzines in which the beneficiary's achivements are commented on by his peers; or copies or trans of major media items (newspaper articles, radio or TV spots, etc.) in which the beneficiary is mentioned by name.
這一條沒有直接的證據，但有媒體采訪總課題首席科學家的報道，我是其中一個子課題主持人，報道中根本沒有替我的名字。這個報道有用嗎？
You may say directly that you are not claim this one, but since the importance of your work you participated, the PI was reported. and your work has been cited by scientists around the world.
另外我滿足了其他幾條：比如是多個雜誌的審稿人，研究成果的原創性（原來提交了多封來自政府部門和其他獨立推薦人的推薦信）。在這次RFE中是否要重新提供一遍這些證據？需要更多推薦信嗎？
Provide a few letters would help too. Highlight these items you claim to be satisfied.
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”
