排期不到,就不能遞I485?誰說的?!

所有跟帖： 

• 對了,誰這樣說跟他沒完!!回複：排期不到,就不能遞I485?誰說的?! -3x3x3x- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/10/2006 postreply 13:49:03

• 3x3x3x,你有來了,覺得你有時是人,有時是鬼,我這討論正經問題呢! -琢磨琢磨- ♀ (15 bytes) () 04/10/2006 postreply 13:51:51

• 3x is right -mytwocents- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/10/2006 postreply 14:00:16

• 好象真的不是這樣.至少可以---遞. -琢磨琢磨- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/10/2006 postreply 14:02:08

• Check INA section 245. -mytwocents- ♂ (158 bytes) () 04/10/2006 postreply 14:09:40

• 拒絕的理由呢? -琢磨琢磨- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/10/2006 postreply 14:15:52

• 回複：拒絕的理由呢? -mytwocents- ♂ (93 bytes) () 04/10/2006 postreply 14:17:49

• And many cases were denied due to that. -mytwocents- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/10/2006 postreply 14:18:33

• 會有很多嗎?排期才開始沒多久,能有那麽多I485被處理到後期嗎? -琢磨琢磨- ♀ (63 bytes) () 04/10/2006 postreply 14:32:25

• 看來你真不清楚派期的問題. -mytwocents- ♂ (180 bytes) () 04/10/2006 postreply 14:52:37

• 看來,這一輪的還不知道結果.謝謝. -琢磨琢磨- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/10/2006 postreply 15:11:37

• 律師是美國人的,要辦這一步時,不妨大膽做一下.之所以強調 -琢磨琢磨- ♀ (80 bytes) () 04/10/2006 postreply 14:09:42

• my laywer is american guy who told me I can't file -calpico- ♂ (78 bytes) () 04/10/2006 postreply 14:13:34

• but someone did it! -琢磨琢磨- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/10/2006 postreply 14:17:47

• 你也可以試試看回來告訴一聲被拒沒有。 -HHLL- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/10/2006 postreply 14:34:55

• I did it! -304415- ♂ (148 bytes) () 04/10/2006 postreply 14:35:35

• 不是說到I485的final stage 才會被拒嗎? -琢磨琢磨- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/10/2006 postreply 14:42:09

• 回複：不是說到I485的final stage 才會被拒嗎? -304415- ♂ (90 bytes) () 04/10/2006 postreply 14:46:05

• 回複：回複：不是說到I485的final stage 才會被拒嗎? -mytwocents- ♂ (86 bytes) () 04/10/2006 postreply 14:53:55

• 回複：排期不到,就不能遞I485?誰說的?! -WorthIt- ♂ (77 bytes) () 04/10/2006 postreply 14:17:29

• 請注意“reject”和“deny'在移民領域是完全不同的含義，否則爭論無 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/10/2006 postreply 15:52:51

• 意義，reject是退回不受理，deny才是拒絕 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/10/2006 postreply 15:54:05

• 一直期待你的聲音:那麽,在此處是reject還是deny?謝謝. -琢磨琢磨- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/10/2006 postreply 17:20:51

• 原則上應該reject,但很可能有被接收了的案子，受理了當然好 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (187 bytes) () 04/10/2006 postreply 17:52:03

• you are so great! -琢磨琢磨- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 06:14:38

• 如果你願意，可以要試一下。 -mytwocents- ♂ (490 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 07:18:36

• 那麽移民局在這種"錯誤"中應該承擔什麽責任呢?全賴申請人? -4yue11hao- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 07:38:54

• 移民局有什麽"錯誤"?移民局的收發室不可能把所有 -mytwocents- ♂ (138 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 07:46:40

• 那麽律師為什麽會犯這樣的錯誤呢?不象中國律師S那樣有公識? -4yue11hao- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 07:59:37

• Vast majority of laywers (>95%) advice against that. -mytwocents- ♂ (62 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 08:13:19

• 排除投機的可能性,律師會不會不知道這個規定? -4yue11hao- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 08:16:51

• 回複：排除投機的可能性,律師會不會不知道這個規定? -mytwocents- ♂ (159 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 08:25:42

• anyway, 很感謝. -4yue11hao- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 08:38:41

• The following is useful in identifying the source of rumor -mytwocents- ♂ (574 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 08:50:48

• 回複：The following is useful in identifying the source of rumor -304415- ♂ (74 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 10:31:52