Correction only about history

來源: mytwocents 2005-12-29 08:55:27 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1058 bytes)
It appears there is more history on this topic than in my previous message. The burger was flipped even more.

The updated timeline of the issue is as follows.

1. In the past, anyone with 485 pending had to use AP for traveling purpose. Using any visa including H/L indicates that they abandon their 485.

2. Then INS changed their policy to allow people on H/L to travel on H/L visa without jeopardizing their 485.

3. A 1997 INS memo allows H/L holder to travel on AP without terminating their orinal H/L privilege. (same policy as the current one ?)

4. In March, 2000. An INS memo was issued to change the policy: people traveling on AP terminated their original H/L staus.

5. On May 16, 2000. A new INS memo (the most recent one) reversed the previous memo. And this time H/Ls are given the maximum freedom. They can travel either on H/L visa or AP. Their working authorization, ability to extend within the US, ability to change to other status within the US, their 485 will not be adversely affected.

所有跟帖: 

How do you understand this sentence in the memo? -65218- 給 65218 發送悄悄話 (693 bytes) () 12/29/2005 postreply 10:21:13

It is hard to understand. My understanding may be not precise. -mytwocents- 給 mytwocents 發送悄悄話 (344 bytes) () 12/29/2005 postreply 11:31:02

回複:It is hard to understand. My understanding may be not prec -65218- 給 65218 發送悄悄話 (127 bytes) () 12/29/2005 postreply 12:00:25

No, definite not, considering the context -mytwocents- 給 mytwocents 發送悄悄話 (453 bytes) () 12/29/2005 postreply 12:13:21

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”