Until then, if the alien's H-1 or L-1 employment authorization would not have expired, had the alien not left and returned under advance parole, the Service will not consider a paroled adjustment applicant's failure to obtain a separate employment authorization document to mean that the paroled adjustment applicant engaged in unauthorized employment by working for the H-1 or L-1 employer between the date of his or her parole and the date to be specified in the final rule.
My understanding is that you have to have a valid H/L approved petition and have not used AP to continue to work with H/L. But this understanding is conflicting with the first sentence in the same paragraph.
How do you understand this sentence in the memo?
所有跟帖:
•
It is hard to understand. My understanding may be not precise.
-mytwocents-
♂
(344 bytes)
()
12/29/2005 postreply
11:31:02
•
回複:It is hard to understand. My understanding may be not prec
-65218-
♀
(127 bytes)
()
12/29/2005 postreply
12:00:25
•
No, definite not, considering the context
-mytwocents-
♂
(453 bytes)
()
12/29/2005 postreply
12:13:21