How do you understand this sentence in the memo?

來源: 65218 2005-12-29 10:21:13 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (693 bytes)
Until then, if the alien's H-1 or L-1 employment authorization would not have expired, had the alien not left and returned under advance parole, the Service will not consider a paroled adjustment applicant's failure to obtain a separate employment authorization document to mean that the paroled adjustment applicant engaged in unauthorized employment by working for the H-1 or L-1 employer between the date of his or her parole and the date to be specified in the final rule.

My understanding is that you have to have a valid H/L approved petition and have not used AP to continue to work with H/L. But this understanding is conflicting with the first sentence in the same paragraph.

所有跟帖: 

It is hard to understand. My understanding may be not precise. -mytwocents- 給 mytwocents 發送悄悄話 (344 bytes) () 12/29/2005 postreply 11:31:02

回複:It is hard to understand. My understanding may be not prec -65218- 給 65218 發送悄悄話 (127 bytes) () 12/29/2005 postreply 12:00:25

No, definite not, considering the context -mytwocents- 給 mytwocents 發送悄悄話 (453 bytes) () 12/29/2005 postreply 12:13:21

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”