Until then, if the alien's H-1 or L-1 employment authorization would not have expired, had the alien not left and returned under advance parole, the Service will not consider a paroled adjustment applicant's failure to obtain a separate employment authorization document to mean that the paroled adjustment applicant engaged in unauthorized employment by working for the H-1 or L-1 employer between the date of his or her parole and the date to be specified in the final rule.
My understanding is that you have to have a valid H/L approved petition and have not used AP to continue to work with H/L. But this understanding is conflicting with the first sentence in the same paragraph.
How do you understand this sentence in the memo?
所有跟帖:
• It is hard to understand. My understanding may be not precise. -mytwocents- ♂ (344 bytes) () 12/29/2005 postreply 11:31:02
• 回複:It is hard to understand. My understanding may be not prec -65218- ♀ (127 bytes) () 12/29/2005 postreply 12:00:25
• No, definite not, considering the context -mytwocents- ♂ (453 bytes) () 12/29/2005 postreply 12:13:21