It is hard to understand. My understanding may be not precise.

來源: mytwocents 2005-12-29 11:31:02 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (344 bytes)
回答: Correction only about historymytwocents2005-12-29 08:55:27
If a person's H/L employment authorization is still valid, if he/she did not leave (the H/L sponsor), and if he/de came back with an AP, working without an EAD is legal until the final rule is published (never happen since then)

Note: only people with a 485 pending and using AP to come back will be called paroled adjustment applicant.

所有跟帖: 

回複:It is hard to understand. My understanding may be not prec -65218- 給 65218 發送悄悄話 (127 bytes) () 12/29/2005 postreply 12:00:25

No, definite not, considering the context -mytwocents- 給 mytwocents 發送悄悄話 (453 bytes) () 12/29/2005 postreply 12:13:21

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”