It is hard to understand. My understanding may be not precise.

來源: mytwocents 於 2005-12-29 11:31:02 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (344 bytes)
回答: Correction only about history 由 mytwocents 於 2005-12-29 08:55:27

If a person's H/L employment authorization is still valid, if he/she did not leave (the H/L sponsor), and if he/de came back with an AP, working without an EAD is legal until the final rule is published (never happen since then)

Note: only people with a 485 pending and using AP to come back will be called paroled adjustment applicant.

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：It is hard to understand. My understanding may be not prec -65218- ♀ 給 65218 發送悄悄話 (127 bytes) () 12/29/2005 postreply 12:00:25

• No, definite not, considering the context -mytwocents- ♂ 給 mytwocents 發送悄悄話 (453 bytes) () 12/29/2005 postreply 12:13:21

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！