ZT:新冠核酸檢測研討文章

來源: 5181 2021-01-22 08:19:28 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1548 bytes)

https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/uc54iVcoBX__CfRBU78dTg

https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/bfRkIBWv_-vtTXhssVF2BQ

https://medicine.yale.edu/labmed/sections/virology/COVID-19%20Ct%20values_YNHH%20Aug.%202020%20_395430_36854_v1.pdf

Points raised in NY Times article•Standard tests diagnose large numbers of people carrying insignificant amounts of virus.

•Most are not likely to be contagious. If Ct >33, virus not grown in culture.

•A cycle threshold >35 is too sensitive.

•A more reasonable cutoff is Ct 30-35 or even Ct <30.

•In NY state lab, 50% of recent positives had Ct >35.

•In MA, 85- 90% of positives in July had Ct >30.

•Cycle threshold is never included in the results sent to clinicians.

•For outbreak tracing, cheap and abundant rapid tests are needed, even if less sensitive

https://www.aacc.org/cln/cln-stat/2020/december/3/sars-cov-2-cycle-threshold-a-metric-that-matters-or-not

 

 

 

所有跟帖: 

看著累 -fuz- 給 fuz 發送悄悄話 fuz 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/23/2021 postreply 08:26:18

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”