ZT: Emerging cases of Covid-19 reinfection

本帖於 2020-07-13 01:44:57 時間, 由普通用戶 fuz 編輯

https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/2020/7/12/21321653/getting-covid-19-twice-reinfection-antibody-herd-immunity

Covid-19 may also be much worse the second time around. During his first infection, my patient experienced a mild cough and sore throat. His second infection, in contrast, was marked by a high fever, shortness of breath, and hypoxia, resulting in multiple trips to the hospital.

Recent reports and conversations with physician colleagues suggest my patient is not alone. Two patients in New Jersey, for instance, appear to have contracted Covid-19 a second time almost two months after fully recovering from their first infection. Daniel Griffin, a physician and researcher at Columbia in New York, recently described a case of presumed reinfection on the This Week in Virology podcast.

It is possible, but unlikely, that my patient had a single infection that lasted three months. Some Covid-19 patients (now dubbed “long haulers”) do appear to suffer persistent infections and symptoms.

My patient, however, cleared his infection — he had two negative PCR tests after his first infection — and felt healthy for nearly six weeks.

…………

I am aware that my patient represents a sample size of one, but taken together with other emerging examples, outlier stories like his are a warning sign of a potential pattern. If my patient is not, in fact, an exception, but instead proves the rule, then many people could catch Covid-19 more than once, and with unpredictable severity.

 

所有跟帖: 

這位醫生注意到兩種情況:1.初病輕,轉陰,幾月後再度中招,病較重;2.持續輕症數月,時陽時陰。提示:群免?嗬嗬 -fuz- 給 fuz 發送悄悄話 fuz 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 01:32:13

我理解你的意思。說明:群體免疫不可信 ,身體裏的抗體2-3月後就消失了。 -lawattaction- 給 lawattaction 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 01:35:57

也說明,疫苗也是無望的 -lawattaction- 給 lawattaction 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 01:37:10

疫苗也許有用,但不是萬能的。比如,打了流感疫苗,有些人仍然會得流感,但總體病例數會少很多 -fuz- 給 fuz 發送悄悄話 fuz 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 01:48:59

群免也許可能,但不能偏信。改善體質,治基礎病,保持隔離,三者不可或缺 -fuz- 給 fuz 發送悄悄話 fuz 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 01:46:25

還有戴口罩和洗手(包括戴手套等):在不可避免的情況下盡量減少病毒濃度進入人體。 -gweipwu- 給 gweipwu 發送悄悄話 gweipwu 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 07:38:16

群體免疫是“沒辦法”遮羞布。66%人口染病才能達群體免疫,那得死多少人啊。 -pickshell- 給 pickshell 發送悄悄話 (404 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 05:07:43

也許根本就沒有好,表麵的死了,深層次的隻是潛伏下來,等免疫係統功能下降,再次爆發。 -kai2002- 給 kai2002 發送悄悄話 kai2002 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 13:32:01

很奇怪,醫學界為什麽不研究用提高人體免疫力的方法應對C-19病毒? -孤舟漁翁- 給 孤舟漁翁 發送悄悄話 孤舟漁翁 的博客首頁 (311 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 07:11:45

漁翁兄好久不見 -dudaan- 給 dudaan 發送悄悄話 dudaan 的博客首頁 (68 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 07:28:04

也希望有相關的信息。 -孤舟漁翁- 給 孤舟漁翁 發送悄悄話 孤舟漁翁 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 07/14/2020 postreply 06:22:53

你的想法沒錯,隻是做不到 -吃與活- 給 吃與活 發送悄悄話 吃與活 的博客首頁 (293 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 09:07:03

同意。 要有個特異性指標來顯示經過這種方法處理後與對照組有顯著差異的數據,才有人有興趣來進一步的治療研究。 -tryyyyyy- 給 tryyyyyy 發送悄悄話 tryyyyyy 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 10:35:41

說到金鍾罩,鐵布衫,那也是擊打自身,但有益無害,也許能說明所謂“應激療法“可能不會造成細胞因子風暴。 -孤舟漁翁- 給 孤舟漁翁 發送悄悄話 孤舟漁翁 的博客首頁 (113 bytes) () 07/14/2020 postreply 06:32:03

我在四月曾貼過一貼,我州一白人女士二次感染 -dudaan- 給 dudaan 發送悄悄話 dudaan 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 07/13/2020 postreply 09:25:29

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!