多多並沒給出任何數據，不覺得可信。你可以看看當時的報紙如何說

http://archives.chicagotribune.com/1979/10/19/page/62/article/chad-a-boy-who-died-of-cancer-and-promises


“Treated consistently with the best of scientific medicine, Chad had at least a 50-50 chance of living a full life. Those who contributed to cutting those chances have much to answer for .”

所有跟帖： 

• 但是誰知道她們會落在哪一個50那裏呢？誰能保證？說這個50-50毫無意義。 -醫者意也- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/19/2015 postreply 12:42:44

• 那就選擇一個0%的？ -吃與活- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/19/2015 postreply 13:14:29

• 0% 50%，都是在信口開河的東西，隨心所欲編造出來的數據，我不知道有什麽可信度可言。 -醫者意也- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/19/2015 postreply 17:21:36

• 醫生用的是survival rate, 小編愣給扯成living full life了。當然醫生使用這些模糊的術語，也是為了進退 -Manymore- ♀ (135 bytes) () 04/19/2015 postreply 13:19:12