空氣汙染是否致癌? 2015年1月發表於Journal of Thoracic Disease的綜述

來源: Lily168 2015-03-02 12:01:16 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (3204 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ Lily168 ] 在 2015-03-02 12:06:07 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.
空氣汙染是否致癌?

20151發表於Journal of Thoracic Disease
 
可以和方舟子的那個1%論對比閱讀一
 
Carcinogenicity of ambient air pollution
 
AAP = “Ambiant Air Pollution”
 
Health risks associated with air pollution include but are not limited to stroke, heart disease, lung cancer, and both chronic and acute respiratory diseases, including asthma (5-8). AAP and its health effects are much more frequently studied compared to HAP.
 
Of the AAP health effects, lung cancer contributes greatly to air pollution associated mortality. The association between exposure to AAP and lung cancer incidence and/or mortality has been evaluated in a number of prospective studies, which are summarized in Table 1. Despite that formal statistical significance was not always reached, the evidence linking exposure to urban air pollutants, mainly PM2.5 or PM10, and lung cancer is generally consistent. Cohorts from the United States as well as from Europe have found increased risks of lung cancer with higher exposure to PM and other substances present in polluted air, with statistically significant risk ratios (RRs) ranging from 1.14 to 5.21 (Table 1).
 
Table 1這裏

所有跟帖: 

謝謝分享,有TABLE 可讀。 -ME_Professor- 給 ME_Professor 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/02/2015 postreply 12:03:34

無法打開鏈接,看不到Table 1 -Lilac2003- 給 Lilac2003 發送悄悄話 Lilac2003 的博客首頁 (82 bytes) () 03/02/2015 postreply 12:04:39

The link should be fixed now -Lily168- 給 Lily168 發送悄悄話 Lily168 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/02/2015 postreply 12:06:30

現在可以讀取。謝謝. -Lilac2003- 給 Lilac2003 發送悄悄話 Lilac2003 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/02/2015 postreply 12:31:46

好像人數多的研究RR離1都不遠。 -吃與活- 給 吃與活 發送悄悄話 吃與活 的博客首頁 (45 bytes) () 03/02/2015 postreply 12:57:01

等你來說。 -Lily168- 給 Lily168 發送悄悄話 Lily168 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/02/2015 postreply 13:00:13

我真的對癌症不感興趣 -吃與活- 給 吃與活 發送悄悄話 吃與活 的博客首頁 (372 bytes) () 03/02/2015 postreply 13:11:45

我原本對方無感,這次才覺得他討厭。最近的討論一開始針對柴靜的太多,針對霧霾的太少。 -Lily168- 給 Lily168 發送悄悄話 Lily168 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/02/2015 postreply 13:19:19

這個可能更全麵,不感興趣沒必要看(我也沒看全),隻是說明他倆論戰的曆史 -吃與活- 給 吃與活 發送悄悄話 吃與活 的博客首頁 (91 bytes) () 03/02/2015 postreply 13:46:32

多謝文獻。樓下老沈的文章裏提到有研究認為每增加10微克/立方米的PM2.5濃度,會導致肺癌死亡率上升15%-27% -viewfinder- 給 viewfinder 發送悄悄話 viewfinder 的博客首頁 (149 bytes) () 03/02/2015 postreply 14:51:37

加拿大McGill大學的一個研究, -Lily168- 給 Lily168 發送悄悄話 Lily168 的博客首頁 (505 bytes) () 03/02/2015 postreply 22:45:02

空氣汙染當然會致癌.這個1%不是說空氣汙染隻讓1%的人得肺癌.而是肺癌裏有1%是空氣汙染導致的.這是不同的. -閩姑- 給 閩姑 發送悄悄話 閩姑 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/02/2015 postreply 18:20:35

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”