據說是Sloan-Kettering’s Dr. Kanematsu Sugiura 對苦杏苷研究的實驗數據

Dr. Sugiura的實驗局限於老鼠實驗。
 

資料一和二來源是Richard Moss，他是個作者，是古典文學（Classics)碩士博士。曾經是assistant director of public affairs at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York (1974-1977)。他和合作者拍了一部有關Laetrile的電影，“Second Opinion", 對同樣話題寫了一本書，"Doctored Results", 揭露主流醫學對苦杏苷研究的壓製。

  http://www.secondopinionfilm.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/anatomy_of_a_coverup_so_02.pdf

 

1.       http://www.secondopinionfilm.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/02-6_2_1974_laetrile_meeting_minutes.pdf  
（對Amygdalin是否要做臨床試驗的會議記錄）

 

2

 

下麵這篇文章Kanematsu Sugiura也是作者之一(?)，解釋了為什麽Sloan Kettering對Amygdalin沒有做臨床試驗:

 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jso.2930100203/abstract

 

 

Abstract

In a series of 6 experiments with CD8F1 mice with spontaneous mammary adenocarcinomas Sugiura noted by macrovisual observation with some histology an overall average of 21% of mice with lung metastases when treated with 1,000–2,000 mg/kg/day of amygdalin compared with 90% of the control mice. The significance attributed to those early observations is seriously challenged by the negative findings of 3 independent investigators, by 2 out of 3 negative cooperative experiments in which Sugiura participated, and particularly by the blind experiment in which he and others under blind readings found no anticancer activity.

 

Treatment of Swiss albino mice showed no destructive effect upon their spontaneous mammary adenocarcinomas. Of the treated mice, 22% were found by macrovisual observation to have lung metastases while 91% were noted among the controls. The results are subject to questions raised in the discussion.

 

Amygdalin at 2,000 mg/kg/day was ineffective both in treating and preventing the development of spontaneous leukemia in AKR mice. At 1,000 mg/kg/day it was not found effective in preventing or significantly delaying the development of spontaneous mammary tumors in CD8F1 mice.

 

In summary, we do not have evidence to support taking amygdalin to clinical trial, although other considerations may require that one be conducted.

所有跟帖： 

• 根據Dr Sugiura的研究數據，大家認為苦杏苷能治癌的證據充足嗎？ -Lily168- ♀ (202 bytes) () 01/29/2015 postreply 12:53:22

• 謝謝Lily把資料擺上來。我粗粗地看過，似乎在老鼠身上有一定效果（效果並非理想）。然而在老鼠實驗上效果非常好的化合物， -吃與活- ♂ (308 bytes) () 01/29/2015 postreply 13:27:02

• 就是這個意思。不知有多少藥物研究在早期由於效果不佳被放棄。“苦杏仁素的研究沒有繼續下去是由於大藥廠的壓製與陰謀”這個說法證據不足 -Lily168- ♀ (16 bytes) () 01/29/2015 postreply 14:07:49

• 舉個例子來說，薑黃素也是沒有辦法拿專利賺大錢的，可是因其療效前景樂觀近年來的研究數不勝數。哪個大藥廠出資金了？ -Lily168- ♀ (6 bytes) () 01/29/2015 postreply 14:08:12

• 其實在我的帖的最後我很想說，歡迎各位用文獻和數據來批駁我的觀點。可是大家批駁的是我的觀點，卻不屑於擺出數據， -吃與活- ♂ (81 bytes) () 01/29/2015 postreply 14:21:08

• 確實是因為測試結果不給力。當然也不排除對個別人有效。但如果放棄被證明更普遍有效的療法，去用這個，是孤注一擲的賭。 -viewfinder- ♀ (39 bytes) () 01/29/2015 postreply 16:07:17

• 影星Steve McQueen就去墨西哥賭了一把。 -Lily168- ♀ (608 bytes) () 01/29/2015 postreply 16:49:21

• 不太了解他的情況。如果本來無藥可醫，孤注一擲也可以理解，反正nothing to lose -viewfinder- ♀ (0 bytes) () 01/29/2015 postreply 17:20:27

• 這個一早就已經有解釋了，建議你去看看相關的視頻 -醫者意也- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/29/2015 postreply 19:02:14