另外還有一個比例也很重要(做為TC／HDL比例值的補充）：
甘油三酯TG／HDL的比例。
理想的比例值在2以下。
用惜福的數據來分析一下：
151／36=4.19 high risk
Triglyceride/HDL ratio range：
2 or less is considered ideal
4 - high risk
6 - very high risk
A Harvard-lead study author reported:
"High triglycerides alone increased the risk of heart attack nearly three-fold.
And people with the highest ratio of triglycerides to HDL -- the "good" cholesterol -- had 16 times the risk of heart attack as those with the lowest ratio of triglycerides to HDL in the study of 340 heart attack patients and 340 of their healthy, same age counterparts.
The ratio of triglycerides to HDL was the strongest predictor of a heart attack, even more accurate than the LDL/HDL ratio (Circulation 1997;96:2520-2525)."
這是一篇文獻，也是哈佛的研究：
http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/96/8/2520.full?max...ournalcode=circulationaha
另外一篇：
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2664115/
我相信現在的顆粒檢查能提供有意義的數據。但是沒有做顆粒檢查的，TC／HDL和TG／HDL這兩個比值比較有預測力。把注意力隻集中在TC－C和LDL－C上是不夠的。
甘油三酯TG／HDL的比例。
理想的比例值在2以下。
用惜福的數據來分析一下：
151／36=4.19 high risk
Triglyceride/HDL ratio range：
2 or less is considered ideal
4 - high risk
6 - very high risk
A Harvard-lead study author reported:
"High triglycerides alone increased the risk of heart attack nearly three-fold.
And people with the highest ratio of triglycerides to HDL -- the "good" cholesterol -- had 16 times the risk of heart attack as those with the lowest ratio of triglycerides to HDL in the study of 340 heart attack patients and 340 of their healthy, same age counterparts.
The ratio of triglycerides to HDL was the strongest predictor of a heart attack, even more accurate than the LDL/HDL ratio (Circulation 1997;96:2520-2525)."
這是一篇文獻，也是哈佛的研究：
http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/96/8/2520.full?max...ournalcode=circulationaha
另外一篇：
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2664115/
我相信現在的顆粒檢查能提供有意義的數據。但是沒有做顆粒檢查的，TC／HDL和TG／HDL這兩個比值比較有預測力。把注意力隻集中在TC－C和LDL－C上是不夠的。
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”
