Does it prove or disprove the 2% annual increase in melanoma bro

所有跟帖： 

• That's not the point. The key is relationship with sunscreens. -26484915- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 13:36:58

• So do your data prove or disprove the link to the use of sunscre -Lily168- ♀ (76 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 13:39:50

• Data indicates sunscreens cut melanoma risk significantly. -26484915- ♂ (2599 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 13:41:22

• Any data about the increase or the decrease of sunscreen use in -Lily168- ♀ (65 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 13:46:47

• the same time period? -Lily168- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 13:48:29

• You have to ask him. It's his point. -26484915- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 13:50:13

• Here are a couple of links -Lily168- ♀ (1049 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 15:01:08

• Thanks for the info. To prove correlation, we'll need to look at -26484915- ♂ (41 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 15:23:16

• Is your point then without the use of the sunscreen melanoma cas -Lily168- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 13:41:34

• Are you saying you agree with the op that sunscreen caused the i -26484915- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 13:44:43

• The increase? -26484915- ♂ (33 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 13:46:01

• I did not read his original post the same way you do. -Lily168- ♀ (528 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 14:23:47

• My impression is that his rebuttal is far from scientific. -26484915- ♂ (185 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 14:44:18

• Are you sure it's not the increased uv exposure -26484915- ♂ (44 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 13:48:21

• The aad.org site offers this explanation: -26484915- ♂ (1008 bytes) () 10/02/2014 postreply 13:55:01