How science goes wrong是那期周刊的封麵文章。

來源: XYZ3 2014-10-02 00:46:37 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (633 bytes)
Last year researchers at one biotech firm, Amgen, found they could reproduce just six of 53 “landmark” studies in cancer research.


Earlier, a group at Bayer, a drug company, managed to repeat just a quarter of 67 similarly important papers.

A leading computer scientist frets that three-quarters of papers in his subfield are bunk.


In 2000-10 roughly 80,000 patients took part in clinical trials based on research that was later retracted because of mistakes or improprieties.所以不到死馬當活馬醫的時候,不要去參加藥物試驗。
請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”