你連貼也不看清楚,就急急忙忙來批判是不是有點不妥當?

來源: 26484915 2014-08-24 12:54:59 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1045 bytes)

這個老狼下麵已經貼過了。你有什麽高見?

這裏是wiki的解釋,看看是否有道理:

When describing the survival experience of a group of people or patients typically the method of overall survival is used, and it presents estimates of the proportion of people or patients alive at a certain point in time. The problem with measuring overall survival using Kaplan-Meier or actuarial survival methods, is that the estimates include two causes of death: 1) deaths due to the disease of interest and; 2) deaths due to all other causes, which includes old age, other cancers, trauma and any other possible cause of death. In general, we are interested in the deaths due to a disease rather than all causes, and therefore a "cause-specific survival analysis" is employed to measure disease-specific survival. Thus, there are two ways in performing a cause-specific survival analysis。。。。

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relative_survival

所有跟帖: 

你也會狗,那你狗不狗呢?讓你說是怎麽算的?凡說算法是騙人的,科普一下算法不好嗎? -零不是數- 給 零不是數 發送悄悄話 零不是數 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 08/24/2014 postreply 15:45:54

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”