有人試過了。

來源: 26484915 2014-08-20 04:44:10 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (12517 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ 26484915 ] 在 2014-08-20 08:08:02 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

 

微波爐水植物無法生長記者實驗辟謠-新聞頻道-華商網

news.hsw.cn › 新聞社會Translate this page
Jun 30, 2014 - 微波爐燒的水含有害物質,讓植物喪失活性,澆花花死,泡豆子發不了芽。為此,《法製 ... 該網友稱,他選擇綠豆作為實驗對象,分別用微波爐水、純淨水、自來水發綠豆芽,發現微波爐水不能讓豆芽生長。該網友用 .... 在恒河邊等待死亡.

美國的:

http://www.snopes.com/science/microwave/plants.asp

Origins:   The introductions of new, widely-adopted technologies are often accompanied by fears of possible deleterious effects from the use of such devices, everything from concerns that telephones would spell the end of regional accents to parental admonitions not to sit too close 
 
to the television (lest you ruin your eyes!). Usually these fears are largely allayed after a few years, as the technologies improve and become ubiquitous, and evidence of the feared negative effects fails to materialize. Nonetheless, even though the microwave oven has been a standard household appliance for several decades now, rumors continue to linger that microwaves somehow "change the molecular structure" of consumables and therefore make food products heated in them unsafe to eat. The sample "experiment" represented above is an expression of that sort of rumor, but it is pure junk science, both in its methodology and its conclusions. 

First of all, water heated in a microwave oven is no different in "structure or energy" than water heated with a gas flame, on an electric stove, or over a wood fire: It's just water, plain and simple. More important, though, is the awareness that drawing valid scientific conclusions from experimentation involves conducting multiple trials under carefully controlled conditions, something not in evidence here. The extraneous factors that could have produced the exhibited results (i.e., one live plant and one dead plant) exhibited above are legion. For example:
  • One plant could have been compromised from the very beginning and would have died even if both plants were treated alike.
  •  

  • The container used to store or boil the microwaved water could have introduced a residual substance into the water that hindered plant growth.
  •  

  • The soil or bedding material used for one of the plants might have contained something (either originally or introduced later) that hindered plant growth.
  •  

  • The two containers of water might have been heated and/or cooled unequally, resulting in one plant's receiving warmer water than the other.
  •  

  • The plants might have been subject to differing environmental factors (e.g., light, heat) due to their placement, or affected differently by external factors (e.g., insects, pets).
  •  

  • Since the experiment was not conducted "blindly," the possibility that the experimenter in some way influenced the results cannot be ruled out.
Rather than simply speculate, though, we performed the same experiment in a more controlled manner. We started out with three each of three different types of plants: one member of each set was given water that had been boiled on a gas stove, water that had been boiled in a microwave oven, or water that had not been boiled at all. All the water used in the experiment came from the same source, the same vessel was used for boiling water both on the stove and in the microwave, and all three types of water were stored in identical containers. The water given to all of the plants was at room temperature. The plants were kept in a carefully controlled environment that protected them from our pets and equalized (as much as possible) their exposure to environmental factors and watered in the manner described above for a period of time identical to that of the original experiment. 

As evidenced by the photos below (taken while the plants were briefly removed from the environment in which they were tended and placed in a setting better suited to photography), at the end of that time period all three plants in each set were fairly thriving. When a non-participating observer was asked to indicate (blindly) which plant in each set he thought had fared the best, in two cases he selected plants that had been given microwave-boiled water, and in one case he selected a plant that had been given unboiled water: 

Click to enlarge 
Click to enlarge 
Click to enlarge
As for the coda to the example quoted at the head of this page, there have been some cases in which the use of microwave-heated blood in medical procedures has been cited as causing serious problems, but not because microwave heating "corrupts the DNA." Rather, conventional microwave ovens can heat blood too quickly and/or too unevenly (resulting in hemolysis), so standard (and slower) blood warming procedures are generally preferred or mandated. 

Read more at http://www.snopes.com/science/microwave/plants.asp#GPVXzl8fcybBxOq6.99

所有跟帖: 

youtube上有人試過,隻有正常的一半高,結出紫色小辣椒而不是正常綠色。。 -心無掛礙2- 給 心無掛礙2 發送悄悄話 (205 bytes) () 08/20/2014 postreply 14:47:25

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”