我說的是基於事實的，這裏麵的也是事實。

來源: TBz 於 2014-06-01 22:39:58 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (2347 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ TBz ] 在 2014-06-02 23:52:27 編輯過。如有問題，請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.
回答: woo, you guys have kept giving people this kind of 由 tournier 於 2014-06-01 22:27:58


The American Cancer Society reported that "[t]here is no reliable scientific evidence that Gerson therapy is effective in treating cancer, and the principles behind it are not widely accepted by the medical community. It is not approved for use in the United States."[2] In 1947, the National Cancer Institute reviewed 10 claimed cures submitted by Gerson; however, all of the patients were receiving standard anticancer treatment simultaneously, making it impossible to determine what effect, if any, was due to Gerson's therapy.[16] A review of the Gerson Therapy by Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center concluded: "If proponents of such therapies wish them to be evaluated scientifically and considered valid adjuvant treatments, they must provide extensive records (more than simple survival rates) and conduct controlled, prospective studies as evidence".[3] In 1959, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) again reviewed cases of patients treated by Gerson. The NCI found that the available information did not prove the regimen had benefit. Cancer Research UK states that "Available scientific evidence does not support any claims that Gerson therapy can treat cancer [...] Gerson therapy can be very harmful to your health."[17]


請您先登陸，再發跟帖！