Michael Osterholm博士告訴財富雜誌,Novavax有可能提供比目前的 mRNA疫苗更長更廣泛的保護.

來源: 5181 2022-09-17 19:35:35 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (5947 bytes)

https://fortune.com/well/2022/09/17/america-skeptical-novavax-popular-abroad-covid-vaccine-covid19-omicron-booster-coroanvirus-pandemic-epidemic-endemic-cdc-fda/

“What excited some people about it is the fact that it’s very similar to a lot of vaccines produced in the past,” Swartzberg said. “Protein vaccines have been used for decades. For some people, that gives them a degree of comfort, based upon emotion and not science.”

Novavax has the potential to offer longer, broader protection than current mRNA vaccines, Dr. Michael Osterholm, director of the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP), told Fortune.

But more data on the vaccine is needed to determine the length of protection it offers, as well as its performance against Omicron subvariants. 

“I think it could be a better vaccine,” Osterholm said, though he cautioned that, in the early days of mRNA COVID vaccines, society had “unbridled expectations that ultimately didn’t pan out,” such as the vaccines preventing infection.

Like mRNA vaccines, Novavax protects against severe COVID outcomes like hospitalization and death. But it doesn’t prevent infection or transmission, according to Yale Medicine.

Maryland-based Novavax began developing its COVID vaccine in 2020, during Operation Warp Speed, but manufacturing difficulties slowed progress. Countries began granting the vaccine approval in November.

In the U.S., the two-dose shot series is approved for those 12 and older, with shots occurring three to eight weeks apart. Side effects are similar to mRNA COVID vaccines and include tenderness, pain, and/or swelling at the injection site, fatigue, muscle pain, joint pain, headache, nausea, vomiting, and/or fever, according to Yale Medicine. As is the case with mRNA COVID vaccines, myocarditis—a rare form of heart inflammation—has been reported, though rarely.

Dr. Bali Pulendran, professor of microbiology and immunology at Stanford University, told Fortune he isn’t sure why the U.S. hasn’t yet approved Novavax for use as a booster, giving those who’ve received a two-dose mRNA series another option, aside from newly approved Omicron mRNA vaccines.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration didn’t immediately respond to Fortune’s question as to why the U.S. hasn’t approved the vaccine for use as a booster, though other countries have.

“It’s a terrific vaccine, and I do hope people get access to it if they wish to,” Pulendran said.

 

所有跟帖: 

有可能就等於沒有。 -AprilMei- 給 AprilMei 發送悄悄話 AprilMei 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/17/2022 postreply 21:11:07

需要統計來證明.蛋白疫苗和mRNA打入後工作原理不一樣. -5181- 給 5181 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/18/2022 postreply 07:06:29

前天看到文章說在美國不受歡迎,隻有不到七千人打,但在許多歐亞國家受歡迎 -dudaan- 給 dudaan 發送悄悄話 dudaan 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/18/2022 postreply 06:11:26

1.是知道人少2.供應藥店少.3.受宣傳影響,好多人即使感染1,2次以上還信mRNA能防重症之說,而不是病毒毒性降低. -5181- 給 5181 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/18/2022 postreply 07:01:34

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”