關鍵是unit of tangible property 如何定義。

來源: 檸檬椰子汁 2024-02-05 12:02:20 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (2142 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ 檸檬椰子汁 ] 在 2024-02-05 12:03:06 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/tangible-property-final-regulations

Step 1 – What is the unit of property to which you should apply the improvement rules?

For the Year Placed in Service - This rule, only for non-building property, is triggered at the time you initially placed the unit of property into service. If at the time the unit of property is first placed in service, you properly treat the component of the unit of property as being within a different MACRS class than the MACRS class for the unit of property of which the component is a part, or you properly depreciate the component using a different depreciation method than the depreciation method used for the unit of property of which the component is a part, then you must treat the component as a separate unit of property.  

假如你建新房,你想把新房裏麵的空調機器算de minimus safe harbor,那麽你必須把這個空調單獨折舊,而不是算到新房裏麵按照27.5 年折舊。

這個就和你說得cost segregation有關了。民居房例子不太好,但是比如說旅館每個房間都有一個小冰箱和微波爐。如果你買來的旅館,可以把幾十個上百個冰箱和微波爐單獨折舊,這個叫做cost segregation。我還是從你那裏聽來的。

那麽,你蓋新旅館,買來幾十個上百個冰箱和微波爐安到房間裏麵,能不能按照de minimus safe harbor處理呢?為什麽不可以?似乎是可以的啊? (de minimus 有沒有總值的限製?好像沒有啊)

 

所有跟帖: 

de minimus safe harbor沒有總額的限製 -jenning- 給 jenning 發送悄悄話 jenning 的博客首頁 (908 bytes) () 02/05/2024 postreply 13:07:44

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”