You can defend yourself in

People who did not restrict their AP were actually

1. trenching on public space because their signal were shooting beyond the boundary of their property;
2. broadcasting their signal, therefore they had no right to say others were stealing (can a radio stations say people who listen to their broadcast are stealing? can a resturant charge people on street when resturants' food smell going out of resturant?)

If someone break into a password protected or non-broadcasted network then and only then it can be called stealing. How can someone staying in his or her house get a uninvited signal get accused of stealing?

People who broadcast their signal should be responsible for their signal be confined ih their property even though they paid for it.

所有跟帖： 

• 我建議你看看新聞。前幾個星期就有兩個倒黴蛋在別人家門口用不設 -Grant- ♂ (35 bytes) () 08/28/2005 postreply 10:13:07

• That's old news but debatable -livefree- ♀ (457 bytes) () 08/28/2005 postreply 16:50:56

• 比如我把車停在路上而我忘了鎖車門，是不是每個人都可以進去玩？ -Grant- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/28/2005 postreply 10:19:10

• why not? if it not driven -away- ♀ (272 bytes) () 08/28/2005 postreply 17:07:22

• would be "thought" abandon -Grant- ♂ (25 bytes) () 08/28/2005 postreply 17:48:16

• in some cities, people don't -Grant- ♂ (80 bytes) () 08/28/2005 postreply 17:49:38

• 樓上的"away"鑽什麽牛角尖啊，你以為你很聰明嗎? -其實你腦子進水了吧- ♀ (122 bytes) () 08/31/2005 postreply 18:59:14