4 home ntwk, WPA still better?

來源: MoConfused 於 2005-01-13 12:21:15 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (284 bytes)

My router supports both WEP and WPA, and from reading the manual it seems WPA is newer and better than WEP. I know no system is foolproof, but is WPA harder to crack/circumvent than WEP? Some WEP even supports 256-bit encryption, which sounds pretty impressive. Still easy to hack?

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：4 home ntwk, WPA still better? -瞎說幾句- ♀ 給 瞎說幾句 發送悄悄話 (403 bytes) () 01/13/2005 postreply 12:58:03

• Thanx! I remember when 128-bit -MoConfused- ♀ 給 MoConfused 發送悄悄話 (1141 bytes) () 01/13/2005 postreply 13:31:26

• 回複：Thanx! I remember when 128-bit -瞎說幾句- ♀ 給 瞎說幾句 發送悄悄話 (665 bytes) () 01/13/2005 postreply 14:12:39

• Yes, ROUTER往外就沒用了, but that is -all_wired!- ♀ 給 all_wired! 發送悄悄話 (305 bytes) () 01/13/2005 postreply 15:07:07

• your comment is only partially --- ♀ 給 - 發送悄悄話 (306 bytes) () 01/13/2005 postreply 14:59:46

• BTW,你的ROUTER支持WPA與是否適合你的環境是兩回事 -瞎說幾句- ♀ 給 瞎說幾句 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 01/13/2005 postreply 13:05:52

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！