作為一個在Quant Finance工作過多年的,送你一段話

本帖於 2025-09-06 13:10:45 時間, 由版主 lionhill 編輯
回答: 也說控製Drawdownjenning2025-09-06 12:57:10

In hindsight, exceptional backtest performance is never that exceptional. A client once told me that he had never seen a backtest that didn’t work. He joked that the only people who can consistently generate Sharpe ratios of 3.0 or above were quants running backtests, and Bernie Madoff. Even when there’s no data mining, i.e. no explicit look-ahead bias, researchers benefit from years of published research on what works and what doesn’t, which is an implicit look-ahead bias. 

Backtests can be useful, but use them carefully. 

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!