本文內容已被 [ career ] 在 2016-10-20 22:27:48 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.
putongren
華夏仙俠
注冊日: 03-03-25
發表數: 7253
|
|
2016-10-19 23:18 |
|
putongren
華夏仙俠
注冊日: 03-03-25
發表數: 7253
|
Re: Univ of Luisvile 物理係招聘教授:白人亞裔勿擾 |
|
高科技公司也在搞這個名堂。
Is It Legal for Intel to Pledge to Reduce the Percentage of Asian-Americans and Indian-Americans Working For Them? (self.KotakuInAction)
submitted 1 year ago * by TheChiefLunaticChief of the Unnoticed
Intel has made a pledge to have their workforce represent their customer base in terms of gender and ethnicity. It's a laudable goal in the abstract. However, Intel already has a very large representation in terms of two minority groups: Asian-Americans and Indian-Americans. Since these are, I guess, not the right kind of minorities, they do not count in Intel's calculations.
I'm an Indian-American. I don't work for Intel or any other large tech company. But I have both Indian-American and Asian-American friends who've excelled in school and worked very hard to earn positions at large tech companies like Intel. Does their hard work mean anything?
Intel has effectively pledged to reduce the amount of Indian-Americans and Asian-Americans who work for them. Relatively speaking, Asians and Indians make up a smallish percentage of the American workforce. So my question is, if Intel carries through on their stated goal to remake their workforce's racial and ethnic demographics, doesn't this necessarily mean that the only two groups that will suffer under this new hiring policy are Americans of Asian and Indian descent? Whites still make up around 40 - 50 percent of the population so, I suppose, their jobs at Intel are safe. But not Indian and Asian-Americans. We will be, I guess, put on some kind of informal blacklist.
Is this legal for Intel to do? Are Indian and Asian-Americans supposed to just accept this and not say a word? What's the "right" percentage of Asian and Indian-Americans that Intel wants to employ? This is similar to the effective blacklisting of Asians and Indians at Ivy League schools. It isn't right. Shame on Intel.
|
|