fake arguement.

I can argue they all, or almost all, 成為頂尖人才. How does the author define頂尖人才? w/o any real data, like who is doing what right now, it is not convincing.I believe the author is intentionly misleading using vague arguments.

所有跟帖： 

• 同意，什麽叫頂尖人才？ 這些狀元應該一半以上出國了 -waitGC- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/26/2011 postreply 08:51:20

• 回複：同意，什麽叫頂尖人才？ 這些狀元應該一半以上出國了 -灰衣人- ♂ (438 bytes) () 06/26/2011 postreply 11:15:56

• 出國了,就不在他們的統計範圍. -leonlz99- ♂ (180 bytes) () 06/26/2011 postreply 14:13:40