回複：Money wise, 40/hour is no better than 60k/year

They also have a permanent position for 70k-90k. I am interviewing for both opennings. I have a feeling that they need someone with my qulifications for the permanent position.

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：回複：Money wise, 40/hour is no better than 60k/year -yijibang- ♂ (72 bytes) () 05/05/2011 postreply 10:34:19

• 回複：回複：回複：Money wise, 40/hour is no better than 60k/year -挨踢並快樂著- ♀ (123 bytes) () 05/05/2011 postreply 10:41:28

• You got that right -胡說之- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/05/2011 postreply 10:44:47

• 回複：回複：Money wise, 40/hour is no better than 60k/year -yijibang- ♂ (72 bytes) () 05/05/2011 postreply 10:34:20

• Then, what's the reason that -胡說之- ♂ (45 bytes) () 05/05/2011 postreply 10:34:23

• 回複：Then, what's the reason that -挨踢並快樂著- ♀ (251 bytes) () 05/05/2011 postreply 10:40:10

• I was open for both options - not a good one -胡說之- ♂ (80 bytes) () 05/05/2011 postreply 10:44:06

• 回複：I was open for both options - not a good one -挨踢並快樂著- ♀ (143 bytes) () 05/05/2011 postreply 10:46:57

• Yes, you do. -胡說之- ♂ (710 bytes) () 05/05/2011 postreply 11:00:00