Question regarding Background Check?

Hi All,

Sorry for not being able to type Chinese, since I don't have a Chinese software.

My concern is:

I accepted a new offer about 10 days ago, that had defined salary and sign-on bonus, benefit package, and start date, etc. Yesterday, however, I received an email asking for details of the last employment (not current employment) for background check purpose. In employment history, I entered an inaccurate salary range that quite HIGHER than real salary of the last employment (for the current employment (about 5.5 years), employment data are very accurate. I am wondering if such an inaccuracy employment data affects this promising offer?

Xie Xie,

Bulls

所有跟帖： 

• you were talking about annual income, not salary -龍少爺- ♂ (49 bytes) () 01/19/2010 postreply 06:24:24

• 回複：you were talking about annual income, not salary -MacBulls- ♂ (187 bytes) () 01/19/2010 postreply 07:02:10

• 回複：you were talking about annual income, not salary -MacBulls- ♂ (376 bytes) () 01/19/2010 postreply 07:18:27

• have you ever heard about put $1 in your previous salaries? -龍少爺- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/19/2010 postreply 07:56:31

• 回複：No, Never heard, what does it mean? have you ever heard about -MacBulls- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/19/2010 postreply 09:23:36

• you don't have to tell them the truth, just type in $1 -龍少爺- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/19/2010 postreply 09:55:44

• I never heard they gave your off b4 backgroud check. -黃國人- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/19/2010 postreply 06:48:33

• You may be in trouble if they gave your off -黃國人- ♂ (96 bytes) () 01/19/2010 postreply 07:01:44

• That's not true -oops_yz- ♀ (231 bytes) () 01/19/2010 postreply 07:20:51

• verbally pending background check is not a real offer -黃國人- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/19/2010 postreply 07:23:56

• 回複：That's not true -MacBulls- ♂ (173 bytes) () 01/19/2010 postreply 07:27:06

• Yes. But, you should have a backup plan! Just... -黃國人- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/19/2010 postreply 07:30:20

• 回複：Yes. But, you should have a backup plan! Just... -MacBulls- ♂ (62 bytes) () 01/19/2010 postreply 07:33:16