Yes, but

Yes, but do you think that's the right way? -- at least the way useful and easy and least-costly? BTW, I don't give damn if somebody threatens improper things, like gun shooting (in that case I'll just hand her/him over to police, or shoot her/him first before she/he gets a chance, I'm not going to touch this part, because precautions are east to take).

We're actually touching the core part of business, workplace and what we want for life, and what kind of system do we want for a better life, and for this regard, do you think "一切都以利益為前提,看你不順眼就一腳踢開" is the only way? After all, what matters to business and workplace is interest.

所有跟帖: 

看你不順眼就一腳踢開---You will have trouble soon. -jill08- 給 jill08 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 01/22/2009 postreply 12:53:29

給你個package讓你走,一切按法律辦事,他會有什麽麻煩 -喜氣連年- 給 喜氣連年 發送悄悄話 喜氣連年 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/22/2009 postreply 12:56:08

Hope not:) -ntking- 給 ntking 發送悄悄話 (141 bytes) () 01/22/2009 postreply 12:56:24

Extremely True in US - co: what matters to business and workplac -coolsnow- 給 coolsnow 發送悄悄話 coolsnow 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/22/2009 postreply 13:00:55

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!