This CNN analysis is more objective. The case was

來源: quantnj 於 2013-07-15 06:41:16 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (334 bytes)
回答: 看了樓下Zimmerman案始末的轉貼 由 73888 於 2013-07-15 03:44:06

aquitted by its own merit. You would probably reach the same conclusion if you were presented the same evidence.

 http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/14/us/zimmerman-why-this-verdict/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
請您先登陸，再發跟帖！