Some. I feel fairness is more important.

來源: Warsteiner 2012-10-15 09:26:45 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (664 bytes)
Let's assume no tax under 30 grand, and 25% for every penny you earned over 30 grand.

In that case, those lawyers, doctors, or other top wage earners will probably be paying less tax, and so are the real middle class - those workers on W2.

However, guys enjoying all kinds of loopholes, like Buffett, Gates, or Romney, would have to pay a lot more. Their personal wealth is a lot more about how they spend their money, a whole lot less about job market.

Policies shouldn't be about whether I like it if it's benefiting this or that group, but rather it's fair and reasonable.

To me, everyone has obligation for tax, and every penny you earned is equal.

所有跟帖: 

如果你把corp tax考慮在裏麵, 就不會認為富人少繳稅了。 -sleepdonkey- 給 sleepdonkey 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 09:44:16

企業與個人應該分開。 -Warsteiner- 給 Warsteiner 發送悄悄話 Warsteiner 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 10:11:01

按照你的邏輯,企業稅應該完全取消. 因為投資人被double taxed. -不開竅- 給 不開竅 發送悄悄話 (84 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 12:14:38

How's that double taxing? -Warsteiner- 給 Warsteiner 發送悄悄話 Warsteiner 的博客首頁 (555 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 12:40:29

回複:How's that double taxing? -不開竅- 給 不開竅 發送悄悄話 (346 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 13:32:22

公司不能deduct分配的紅利3000. -不開竅- 給 不開竅 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 13:36:01

工資獎金形式,不是紅利。如果3000當獎金發掉,公司盈利0. -Warsteiner- 給 Warsteiner 發送悄悄話 Warsteiner 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 14:06:53

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”