the wealthy will pay much less if flat tax rate is introduced.

來源: quantnj 2012-10-15 09:14:47 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (329 bytes)

middle class an the poor would pay much more. eventually, you need to introduce different level of cut-offs and deductions.

you are a very intelligent guy but i feel you are contradicting yourself when talking with tax: you want the wealthy pay more but you favor a policy which will tremendously befefit them

所有跟帖: 

Some. I feel fairness is more important. -Warsteiner- 給 Warsteiner 發送悄悄話 Warsteiner 的博客首頁 (664 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 09:26:45

如果你把corp tax考慮在裏麵, 就不會認為富人少繳稅了。 -sleepdonkey- 給 sleepdonkey 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 09:44:16

企業與個人應該分開。 -Warsteiner- 給 Warsteiner 發送悄悄話 Warsteiner 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 10:11:01

按照你的邏輯,企業稅應該完全取消. 因為投資人被double taxed. -不開竅- 給 不開竅 發送悄悄話 (84 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 12:14:38

How's that double taxing? -Warsteiner- 給 Warsteiner 發送悄悄話 Warsteiner 的博客首頁 (555 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 12:40:29

回複:How's that double taxing? -不開竅- 給 不開竅 發送悄悄話 (346 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 13:32:22

公司不能deduct分配的紅利3000. -不開竅- 給 不開竅 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 13:36:01

工資獎金形式,不是紅利。如果3000當獎金發掉,公司盈利0. -Warsteiner- 給 Warsteiner 發送悄悄話 Warsteiner 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 14:06:53

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”