Voters are between a rock and a hard place:)

I see it this way, I agree with Obama's vision - universal healthcare, more transparency on wall street, and more real money less spin in tax system.

On the surface, Obama is after rich people, but most of them were benefited from the tax code - capital gain etc. So, it's really about fair taxes.

That being said, I do not approve his execution, or lacking thereof.

Romney on the other hand, got all the visions backwards. No matter how perfect his execution experience might have been, he's going to fail. Not personally, but the road they are going down.

Without universal healthcare, the cost burden and conflict will only intensify. Without more transparency, financial crisis will only occur more often. Without a fair and simplified tax code, polarization and even hatred between rich and poor will become more drastic.

Obama could be a bad choice, but Romney is a no-choice. Can we get slick Willy back?:)

所有跟帖： 

• MA has universal healthcare that ROmmy instituted....much is wha -lilipp- ♀ (121 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 08:15:07

• republicans favor simplified tax code than democrats. -quantnj- ♀ (441 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 08:20:02

• romneycare is the model for 08's universal healthcare -quantnj- ♀ (691 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 08:36:06

• Romney is actually backing up from his "vision", -Warsteiner- ♂ (777 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 08:45:15

• romney didn't back away his romneycare in primary contests -quantnj- ♀ (146 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 08:56:13

• Didn't GOP attack Obama for "forcing people buy insurance"? -Warsteiner- ♂ (296 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 09:10:33

• romney defended "individual mandate" in a primary debate when -quantnj- ♀ (123 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 09:28:20

• I somewhat agree with your take on obmacare, but universal shoul -Warsteiner- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 09:32:33