Challengers normally do better in debates than incumbents,

來源: Warsteiner 於 2012-10-03 18:48:07 [檔案] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀：次 (599 bytes)

本文內容已被 [ Warsteiner ] 在 2012-10-03 22:42:23 編輯過。如有問題，請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

回答: 奧巴馬看來真不如羅姆尼懂經濟，至少在支持小生意這個問題上由看熱鬧的北京人於 2012-10-03 18:27:13

simply because he/she only needs to point out that the president hasn't done well, especially when the economy isn't in great shape.

However, the problem is, whether the challenger has a solution to address the issue he/she points out.

Romney has promised to lower the tax and cut the deficit, by CLOSING LOOPHOLES. Honestly, I think that's bogus or disingenuous to say the least. US spends more than they take in. Closing loopholes is important, but you have to quantify it. What loophole gives you what. Without that, it's emptier than the suggestion to just fire a rocket at the carrier:)